These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9797255)

  • 1. Automated confocal laser scanning microscopy and semiautomated image processing for analysis of biofilms.
    Kuehn M; Hausner M; Bungartz HJ; Wagner M; Wilderer PA; Wuertz S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 64(11):4115-27. PubMed ID: 9797255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward automated analysis of biofilm architecture: bias caused by extraneous confocal laser scanning microscopy images.
    Merod RT; Warren JE; McCaslin H; Wuertz S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 73(15):4922-30. PubMed ID: 17545329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconstruction and computation of microscale biovolumes using geographical information systems: potential difficulties.
    Petrisor AI; Cuc A; Decho AW
    Res Microbiol; 2004; 155(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 15249061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual labeling with green fluorescent proteins for confocal microscopy.
    Cowan SE; Gilbert E; Khlebnikov A; Keasling JD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 66(1):413-8. PubMed ID: 10618256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective threshold selection procedure (OTS) for segmentation of scanning laser confocal microscope images.
    Xavier JB; Schnell A; Wuertz S; Palmer R; White DC; Almeida JS
    J Microbiol Methods; 2001 Nov; 47(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 11576681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms.
    Lawrence JR; Korber DR; Hoyle BD; Costerton JW; Caldwell DE
    J Bacteriol; 1991 Oct; 173(20):6558-67. PubMed ID: 1917879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real time monitoring of biofilm development under flow conditions in porous media.
    Bozorg A; Gates ID; Sen A
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(9):937-51. PubMed ID: 22963147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods for studying biofilm formation: flow cells and confocal laser scanning microscopy.
    Tolker-Nielsen T; Sternberg C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1149():615-29. PubMed ID: 24818937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-invasive method to quantify local bacterial concentrations in a mixed culture biofilm.
    Ma H; Bryers JD
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 37(10):1081-9. PubMed ID: 20552252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Sensitive Thresholding Method for Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Image Stacks of Microbial Biofilms.
    Luo TL; Eisenberg MC; Hayashi MAL; Gonzalez-Cabezas C; Foxman B; Marrs CF; Rickard AH
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):13013. PubMed ID: 30158655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antigen 43 facilitates formation of multispecies biofilms.
    Kjaergaard K; Schembri MA; Ramos C; Molin S; Klemm P
    Environ Microbiol; 2000 Dec; 2(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 11214802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT.
    Heydorn A; Nielsen AT; Hentzer M; Sternberg C; Givskov M; Ersbøll BK; Molin S
    Microbiology (Reading); 2000 Oct; 146 ( Pt 10)():2395-2407. PubMed ID: 11021916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High rates of conjugation in bacterial biofilms as determined by quantitative in situ analysis.
    Hausner M; Wuertz S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1999 Aug; 65(8):3710-3. PubMed ID: 10427070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compatibility of the green fluorescent protein and a general nucleic acid stain for quantitative description of a Pseudomonas putida biofilm.
    Nancharaiah YV; Venugopalan VP; Wuertz S; Wilderer PA; Hausner M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2005 Feb; 60(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 15590092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of spatial distributions of zinc and active biomass in microbial biofilms by two-photon laser scanning microscopy.
    Hu Z; Hidalgo G; Houston PL; Hay AG; Shuler ML; Abruña HD; Ghiorse WC; Lion LW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Jul; 71(7):4014-21. PubMed ID: 16000816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of flow regime on the architecture of a Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilm.
    Pereira MO; Kuehn M; Wuertz S; Neu T; Melo LF
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2002 Apr; 78(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 11870607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agarose stabilization of fragile biofilms for quantitative structure analysis.
    Pittman KJ; Robbins CM; Osborn JL; Stubblefield BA; Gilbert ES
    J Microbiol Methods; 2010 May; 81(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 20152866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of 3D architecture of uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis batch culture biofilms-A quantitative confocal microscopy approach.
    Schlapp G; Scavone P; Zunino P; Härtel S
    J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Nov; 87(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 21864585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distribution of bacterial growth activity in flow-chamber biofilms.
    Sternberg C; Christensen BB; Johansen T; Toftgaard Nielsen A; Andersen JB; Givskov M; Molin S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1999 Sep; 65(9):4108-17. PubMed ID: 10473423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structure and Fluorescence Intensity Measurements in Biofilms.
    Cinquin B; Lopes F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2040():117-133. PubMed ID: 31432478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.