These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9798239)

  • 21. Detection of simulated periodontal bone gain by digital subtraction radiography with tuned-aperture computed tomography. The effect of angular disparity.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 11313728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Subtraction radiography of interradicular bone lesions.
    Kullendorff B; Gröndahl K; Rohlin M; Nilsson M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1992 Oct; 50(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 1441929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of a new digital subtraction system: an in vitro study.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD; Hamilton KE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jun; 89(6):771-6. PubMed ID: 10846136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital subtraction radiography for assessing alveolar bone grafts: diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity.
    Maruko EY; Forbes DP
    Northwest Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 8148133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws.
    Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17048029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of stent versus laser- and cephalostat-aligned periapical film-positioning techniques for use in digital subtraction radiography.
    Ludlow JB; Peleaux CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 8139840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of two imaging modalities: F-speed film and digital images for detection of osseous defects in patients with interdental vertical bone defects.
    Jorgenson T; Masood F; Beckerley JM; Burgin C; Parker DE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):500-5. PubMed ID: 18033948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
    J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of peri-implant bone change.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; van den Berg HR; Bertens E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Mar; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 1420723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants.
    De Smet E; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Naert I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 12058265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital subtraction radiographic analysis of GTR in human intrabony defects.
    Danesh-Meyer MJ; Chen ST; Rams TE
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Oct; 22(5):441-9. PubMed ID: 12449304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
    Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital radiography: an overview.
    Parks ET; Williamson GF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2002 Nov; 3(4):23-39. PubMed ID: 12444400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of scaling and root planing on alveolar bone as measured by subtraction radiography.
    Hwang YJ; Fien MJ; Lee SS; Kim TI; Seol YJ; Lee YM; Ku Y; Rhyu IC; Chung CP; Han SB
    J Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 79(9):1663-9. PubMed ID: 18771367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images.
    Nair MK; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Denton G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 May; 85(5):608-12. PubMed ID: 9619682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of methods to assess marginal bone height around endosseous implants.
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 20(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 8473534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.