These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9798846)

  • 1. Radiography of the surgical breast biopsy specimen.
    Homer MJ; Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1197-9. PubMed ID: 9798846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physician-to-physician communication.
    Avery JK
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1994 Nov; 87(11):482-3. PubMed ID: 7983866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Malpractice issues in radiology. Emerging technologies.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 10430116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fear of cancer.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Aug; 183(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 15269009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Legal liability of the radiologist in missed breast cancer diagnosis].
    Mortier M; Villeirs G
    JBR-BTR; 2003; 86(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12693376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Not Available].
    Rofo; 2020 Mar; 192(3):283-286. PubMed ID: 32074644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Authors' Reply.
    Mezrich JL; Siegel E
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Nov; 12(11):1135-6. PubMed ID: 26541129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Errors of omission.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Dec; 185(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 16303991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Archive or Discard Computer-Aided Detection Markings: Two Schools of Thought.
    Berlin L
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Nov; 12(11):1134-5. PubMed ID: 26541128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physician-to-physician communication.
    Avery JK
    J Ark Med Soc; 1996 Mar; 92(10):505-6. PubMed ID: 8867238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New York court rejects liability theory. Megally v. LaPorta.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1999 Dec; 17(2):6-8. PubMed ID: 10724624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lessons learned from reviewing breast imaging malpractice cases.
    Arleo EK; Saleh M; Rosenblatt R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1186-8. PubMed ID: 24889476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Listening to the patient's natural alarm system.
    Klein CA
    Nurse Pract; 2000 Feb; 25(2):78-9. PubMed ID: 10703025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Pitfalls of Rendering an Expert Opinion in Breast Malpractice Cases by Reviewing a CD-ROM.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Apr; 13(4):424-5. PubMed ID: 26768543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missed mammographic abnormalities, malpractice, and expert witnesses: does majority rule in the courtroom?
    Berlin L
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):288; author reply 289. PubMed ID: 14519882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Document your reasoning, too.
    Johnson LJ
    Med Econ; 2003 Apr; 80(8):94. PubMed ID: 12776680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. And God said, "that's the idea".
    Avery JK
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1989 Sep; 82(9):485, 487. PubMed ID: 2796339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgeons are now reading radiological literature.
    Osborne JM
    Australas Radiol; 1990 Aug; 34(3):279. PubMed ID: 2275697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Defending the "missed" radiographic diagnosis.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):471-3. PubMed ID: 11461891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma.
    Hall FM; Houlihan MJ; Baum JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):766. PubMed ID: 7741876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.