These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A critique of the Massachusetts determination of need program. Sullivan PR; Damsgaard A; Rodkey GV N Engl J Med; 1979 Apr; 300(14):794-5. PubMed ID: 106276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The economics of computed tomography: comparison with other health care costs. Evens RG Radiology; 1980 Aug; 136(2):509-10. PubMed ID: 6773103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of CT: what the studies show. Phillips DF Hosp Med Staff; 1978 Apr; 7(4):12-9. PubMed ID: 10306905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measuring value. Baker LC; Atlas SW; Afendulis CC Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(6):1467-78. PubMed ID: 18997202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Costs, charges, and revenues for hospital diagnostic imaging procedures: differences by modality and hospital characteristics. Sistrom CL; McKay NL J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 17411868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health system agencies and state health planning development agencies; certificate of need reviews--HRSA. Notice regarding adjustment of the expenditure minimum for capital expenditures and the expenditure minimum for annual operating costs. Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(68):14027. PubMed ID: 10270563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing costs and efficacy of MRI. Bradley WG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1307-10. PubMed ID: 3486575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-benefit evaluation of body computed tomography. Moore AT; Dixon AK; Rubenstein D; Wheeler T Health Trends; 1987 Aug; 19(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 10312239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic implications of a new technology installation: a CT model. Evens RG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Apr; 136(4):673-7. PubMed ID: 6784460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost modeling as a technology assessment tool for radiology department capital equipment acquisitions. Marion JL; Vanden Brink JA J Healthc Resour Manag; 1996 Jun; 14(5):8-13. PubMed ID: 10158615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT screening for comorbid disease in patients with prostatic carcinoma: is it cost-effective? Forman HP; Heiken JP; Brink JA; Glazer HS; Fox LA; McClennan BL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1125-8; discussion 1129-30. PubMed ID: 8165996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS. Hilsenrath PE; Smith WL; Berbaum KS; Franken EA; Owen DA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Jan; 156(1):177-80. PubMed ID: 1898556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The diagnostic and economic yield of neuroimaging in neuro-ophthalmology. Mehta S; Loevner LA; Mikityansky I; Langlotz C; Ying GS; Tamhankar MA; Shindler KS; Volpe NJ J Neuroophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 32(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 22510684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic impact analysis for certificate of need applications. Reiss JB Am J Health Plann; 1978 Jan; 3(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 10305963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the CAT scanner and other diagnostic technologies. Banta HD; McNeil BJ Health Care Manage Rev; 1978; 3(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 10316567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]