These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 979927)

  • 1. Calibration instrumentation used by the AAPM Radiological Physics Center.
    Grant W; Cundiff J; Hanson W; Gagnon W; Shalek R
    Med Phys; 1976 SEP-OCT; 3(5):353-4. PubMed ID: 979927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of the reliability of chamber factors used clinically in the United States (1968--1976).
    Hanson WF; Grant W; Kennedy P; Cundiff JH; Gagnon WF; Berkley LW; Shalek RJ
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(6):552-5. PubMed ID: 104138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The US radiation dosimetry standards for 60Co therapy level beams, and the transfer to the AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Minniti R; Chen-Mayer H; Seltzer SM; Huq MS; Bryson L; Slowey T; Micka JA; DeWerd LA; Wells N; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS;
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16696484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
    Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
    Huq MS; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of discrepancies encountered by the AAPM radiological physics center.
    Gagnon WF; Berkley LW; Kennedy P; Hanson WF; Shalek RJ
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(6):556-60. PubMed ID: 104139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of relative electrometer calibration factor with user beam.].
    Hatanaka S; Fujisaki T; Myojoyama A; Hiraoka T; Saitoh H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2008; 27(3):129-35. PubMed ID: 18367823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of Aion and Pion in the new AAPM radiotherapy dosimetry protocol.
    Attix FH
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(5):714-6. PubMed ID: 6503889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The implementation of the AAPM Task Group 21 protocol by the Radiological Physics Center and its implications.
    Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF; Shalek RJ; Berkley LW
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 6434921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calibration of the Gamma Knife Perfexion using TG-21 and the solid water Leksell dosimetry phantom.
    McDonald D; Yount C; Koch N; Ashenafi M; Peng J; Vanek K
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1685-93. PubMed ID: 21520881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A chamber and electrometer calibration factor as determined by each of the five AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
    Blackwell CR; McCullough EC
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(1):207-8. PubMed ID: 1620050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calibration of the Gamma Knife using a new phantom following the AAPM TG51 and TG21 protocols.
    Drzymala RE; Wood RC; Levy J
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):514-21. PubMed ID: 18383672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Portable transfer digital dosemeter for beam output measurements with X and gamma rays, electrons and neutrons.
    Sankaran A; Gokarn RS; Gangadharan P
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Apr; 54(640):328-34. PubMed ID: 7225720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of humidity and other correction factors in the AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocol.
    Rogers DW; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 3352550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The international Co-60 gamma ray dosimetry intercomparisons at NIRS].
    Hoshino K; Kawashima K; Hiraoka T; Matsuzawa H; Sakata S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jul; 45(7):1039-46. PubMed ID: 4080523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of effective points of measurements by a Farmer cylindrical chamber on the electron beam dose calibrations at dmax.
    Kubo H
    Phys Med Biol; 1988 Mar; 33(3):379-80. PubMed ID: 3362975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of dose calibration by ionometric and chemical dosimetry for 6- and 45-MV x-ray beams.
    Zwicker RD; Wu A; Sternick ES
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1251-3. PubMed ID: 1753913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.