These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9799642)

  • 1. A soft, mean-field potential derived from crystal contacts for predicting protein-protein interactions.
    Robert CH; Janin J
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Nov; 283(5):1037-47. PubMed ID: 9799642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential.
    Liu Z; Dominy BN; Shakhnovich EI
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jul; 126(27):8515-28. PubMed ID: 15238009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding.
    Liu S; Zhang C; Zhou H; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2004 Jul; 56(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 15162489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MIAX: a new paradigm for modeling biomacromolecular interactions and complex formation in condensed phases.
    Del Carpio-Muñoz CA; Ichiishi E; Yoshimori A; Yoshikawa T
    Proteins; 2002 Sep; 48(4):696-732. PubMed ID: 12211037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein-protein crystal-packing contacts.
    Carugo O; Argos P
    Protein Sci; 1997 Oct; 6(10):2261-3. PubMed ID: 9336849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins.
    Norel R; Petrey D; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R
    Proteins; 1999 Aug; 36(3):307-17. PubMed ID: 10409824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A knowledge-based forcefield for protein-protein interface design.
    Clark LA; van Vlijmen HW
    Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1540-50. PubMed ID: 17910054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A combinatorial score to distinguish biological and nonbiological protein-protein interfaces.
    Liu S; Li Q; Lai L
    Proteins; 2006 Jul; 64(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16596649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking.
    Murphy J; Gatchell DW; Prasad JC; Vajda S
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):840-54. PubMed ID: 14635126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physicochemical and residue conservation calculations to improve the ranking of protein-protein docking solutions.
    Duan Y; Reddy BV; Kaznessis YN
    Protein Sci; 2005 Feb; 14(2):316-28. PubMed ID: 15659366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Information and discrimination in pairwise contact potentials.
    Solis AD; Rackovsky S
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1071-87. PubMed ID: 18004788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissection of binding interactions in the complex between the anti-lysozyme antibody HyHEL-63 and its antigen.
    Li Y; Urrutia M; Smith-Gill SJ; Mariuzza RA
    Biochemistry; 2003 Jan; 42(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 12515535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Watson P; Gillet V; Willett P
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of the binding energy for small molecules, peptides and proteins.
    Schapira M; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    J Mol Recognit; 1999; 12(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 10398408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lessons from the design of a novel atomic potential for protein folding.
    Chen WW; Shakhnovich EI
    Protein Sci; 2005 Jul; 14(7):1741-52. PubMed ID: 15987903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of an empirical free energy function for calculating protein-protein binding free energy surfaces.
    Audie J
    Biophys Chem; 2009 Feb; 139(2-3):84-91. PubMed ID: 19041170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reversible lattice repacking illustrates the temperature dependence of macromolecular interactions.
    Juers DH; Matthews BW
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Aug; 311(4):851-62. PubMed ID: 11518535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.