155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9799762)
1. Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data?
Stöckl D; Dewitte K; Thienpont LM
Clin Chem; 1998 Nov; 44(11):2340-6. PubMed ID: 9799762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reproducibility of automated estradiol-17beta and progesterone assays using native serum samples: results obtained in the Belgian external assessment scheme.
Coucke W; Devleeschouwer N; Libeer JC; Schiettecatte J; Martin M; Smitz J
Hum Reprod; 2007 Dec; 22(12):3204-9. PubMed ID: 18025029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression.
Bilić-Zulle L
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2011; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 22141206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays.
Krouwer JS
Clin Chem; 2002 Jun; 48(6 Pt 1):919-27. PubMed ID: 12029009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis.
Linnet K
Clin Chem; 1999 Jun; 45(6 Pt 1):882-94. PubMed ID: 10351998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results from a multicenter evaluation of the 4th generation Elecsys Troponin T assay.
Hermsen D; Apple F; Garcia-Beltràn L; Jaffe A; Karon B; Lewandrowski E; Mühlbacher A; Müller R; Ordóñez J; Pagani F; Panteghini M; Plecko T; Jarausch J
Clin Lab; 2007; 53(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 17323819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 2. Defining analytical goals applied to the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes by blood glucose concentrations.
Haeckel R; Wosniok W
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Feb; 42(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 15061361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A practical guide to validation and verification of analytical methods in the clinical laboratory.
Pum J
Adv Clin Chem; 2019; 90():215-281. PubMed ID: 31122610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the new restandardized 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay on the iSYS platform.
Denimal D; Roux S; Duvillard L
Clin Biochem; 2018 Feb; 52():156-160. PubMed ID: 29174995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Validity of immunochemical assays for blood estradiol. Study conducted in 1994].
Patricot MC; Badonnel Y; Bugugnani MJ; Collignon I; Delvigne L; Lacroix I; Mathian B
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1995; 53(7-8):399-406. PubMed ID: 8597310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear regression analysis for comparing two measurers or methods of measurement: but which regression?
Ludbrook J
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2010 Jul; 37(7):692-9. PubMed ID: 20337658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of 5 routine assays for serum free testosterone with a candidate reference measurement procedure based on ultrafiltration and isotope dilution-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Van Uytfanghe K; Stöckl D; Kaufman JM; Fiers T; De Leenheer A; Thienpont LM
Clin Biochem; 2005 Mar; 38(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 15708548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytical and clinical performance of an automated immunoassay system (Immulite) for estradiol in serum.
Rodríguez-Espinosa J; Otal-Entraigas C; Gascón-Roche N; Mora-Brugués J; Urgell-Rull E; Bordás-Serrat JR; Viscasillas-Molins P
Clin Chem Lab Med; 1998 Dec; 36(12):969-74. PubMed ID: 9915231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy assessments of quantitative diagnostic tests for clinical research.
Atiqi R; van Iersel C; Cleophas TJ
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Mar; 47(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19281723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach.
Püntmann I; Wosniok W; Haeckel R
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):809-20. PubMed ID: 12880146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrinsic and routine quality of serum total potassium measurement as investigated by split-sample measurement with an ion chromatography candidate reference method.
Thienpont LM; Van Nuwenborg JE; Stöckl D
Clin Chem; 1998 Apr; 44(4):849-57. PubMed ID: 9554498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
