These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Evaluation of the New DIN Standard for Quality Assurance of Diagnostic Displays - Technical Review DIN 6868-157. Entz K; Sommer A; Lenzen H Rofo; 2018 Jan; 190(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 29258133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Quality assurance in roentgen diagnosis. Comparison of constancy test methods according to DIN and IEC and practical consequences in Germany]. Rassow J; Kütterer G; Neitzel U; Puschert W Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):206-12. PubMed ID: 8924457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Establishing a quality management system according to DIN EN ISO 9001:2000 in an academic radiological department]. Adam G; Lorenzen J; Krupski G; Schackmann R; Steiner P; Reuter H; Paschen U Rofo; 2003 Feb; 175(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 12584615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quality assurance from the viewpoint of the x-ray film industry]. von Volkmann T Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):367-76. PubMed ID: 1410322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II]. Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of two automatic evaluation methods on Images of the CDMAM test phantom]. Blendl C; Loos C; Eiben B Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):637-43. PubMed ID: 19513964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Documentation and constancy evaluation of medical roentgen units. Direct radiography with digital image recording systems]. Huber S Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(7):238-43. PubMed ID: 10605326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI quality control tools for procedures and analyses. Di Nallo AM; Ortenzia O; D'Arienzo M; Coniglio D; Benassi M J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Mar; 25(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 16761628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quality assurance of nuclear medicine measuring systems: what do the new regulations say?]. Jordan K; Knoop B; Harke H Nuklearmedizin; 1994 Apr; 33(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 8177753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reference levels for image quality in mammography. Zdesar U Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Documentation and quality assurance in clinical routine]. Lübke N Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Mar; 94(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 10782504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Imaging monitors--requirements and pitfalls]. Simmler R Radiologe; 2013 Nov; 53(11):1020-2. PubMed ID: 24068292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Documentation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory using electronic databases--experiences in 176 German cath labs]. Wiesmann F; Heinrich D; Greger H; Ertl G; Voelker W Z Kardiol; 2003 Jul; 92(7):571-80. PubMed ID: 12883842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of quality control methods for medical documentation. Stausberg J Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():864-8. PubMed ID: 10179791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Introduction of a quality management system compliant with DIN EN 9001:2000 in a university department of nuclear medicine]. Jansen-Schmidt V; Paschen U; Kröger S; Bohuslavizki KH; Clausen M Nuklearmedizin; 2001 Dec; 40(6):228-38. PubMed ID: 11797512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quality control of laser imagers]. Winkelbauer F; Ammann M; Gerstner N; Imhof H Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):334-8. PubMed ID: 1457474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]