642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9800710)
21. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.
Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology.
Betal D; Roberts N; Whitehouse GH
Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):903-17. PubMed ID: 9486066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Lo SC; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 1995 Oct; 22(10):1555-67. PubMed ID: 8551980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: classification of mass and normal tissue by texture analysis.
Petrosian A; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2273-88. PubMed ID: 15551553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Gurcan M
Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2309-17. PubMed ID: 11764038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimally weighted wavelet transform based on supervised training for detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Zhang W; Yoshida H; Nishikawa RM; Doi K
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):949-56. PubMed ID: 9650185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms.
Nakayama R; Uchiyama Y; Watanabe R; Katsuragawa S; Namba K; Doi K
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):789-99. PubMed ID: 15124996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types.
Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Hendriks JH
Med Phys; 2000 Nov; 27(11):2600-8. PubMed ID: 11128313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Characterization of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms using neural networks and support vector machines.
Papadopoulos A; Fotiadis DI; Likas A
Artif Intell Med; 2005 Jun; 34(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 15894178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Statistical textural features for detection of microcalcifications in digitized mammograms.
Kim JK; Park HW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Mar; 18(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 10363701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Urinary bladder cancer staging in CT urography using machine learning.
Garapati SS; Hadjiiski L; Cha KH; Chan HP; Caoili EM; Cohan RH; Weizer A; Alva A; Paramagul C; Wei J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5814-5823. PubMed ID: 28786480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM; Ramachandran A; Paramagul C; LeCarpentier GL; Nees A; Blane C
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):744-54. PubMed ID: 15124991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.
Shi J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Nees A; Wu YT; Wei J; Zhou C; Zhang Y; Cui J
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 18293583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An automatic method for the identification and interpretation of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
Schmidt F; Sorantin E; Szepesvàri C; Graif E; Becker M; Mayer H; Hartwagner K
Phys Med Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):1231-43. PubMed ID: 10368015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluating geodesic active contours in microcalcifications segmentation on mammograms.
Duarte MA; Alvarenga AV; Azevedo CM; Calas MJ; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Dec; 122(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 26363676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Zhang W; Doi K; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 8860907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters.
Kallergi M
Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):314-26. PubMed ID: 15000617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
