340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9801036)
1. Peripheral retinal evaluation comparing fundus photographs with fluorescein angiograms in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Agardh E; Cavallin-Sjöberg U
Retina; 1998; 18(5):420-3. PubMed ID: 9801036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Grading of diabetic retinopathy from non-stereoscopic color fundus photographs--relationship to fluorescein angiography findings and three-year prognosis].
Kitano S
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Sep; 109(9):563-72. PubMed ID: 16218434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography.
Nghiem AZ; Nderitu P; Lukic M; Khatun M; Largan R; Kortuem K; Balaskas K; Sim D
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1035-e1040. PubMed ID: 31286663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is one 60 degrees fundus photograph sufficient for screening of proliferative diabetic retinopathy?
Møller F; Hansen M; Sjølie AK
Diabetes Care; 2001 Dec; 24(12):2083-5. PubMed ID: 11723087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-year follow-up study of blood-retinal barrier and retinal thickness alterations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Lobo CL; Bernardes RC; Figueira JP; de Abreu JR; Cunha-Vaz JG
Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 122(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 14769598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retinal microaneurysm counts in diabetic retinopathy: colour photography versus fluorescein angiography.
Friberg TR; Lace J; Rosenstock J; Raskin P
Can J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jun; 22(4):226-9. PubMed ID: 3607597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Entoptic evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Applegate RA; Bradley A; van Heuven WA; Lee BL; Garcia CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Apr; 38(5):783-91. PubMed ID: 9112972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oral fluorescein angiography with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope in diabetic retinopathy: a case controlled comparison with intravenous fluorescein angiography.
Squirrell D; Dinakaran S; Dhingra S; Mody C; Brand C; Talbot J
Eye (Lond); 2005 Apr; 19(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 15184968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-mydriatic fundus photography: a viable alternative to fundoscopy for identification of diabetic retinopathy in an Aboriginal population in rural Western Australia?
Diamond JP; McKinnon M; Barry C; Geary D; McAllister IL; House P; Constable IJ
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 9630290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of digital color fundus imaging and fluorescein angiographic findings for the early detection of diabetic retinopathy in young type 1 diabetic patients.
Kapsala Z; Anastasakis A; Mamoulakis D; Maniadaki I; Tsilimbaris M
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 29191678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fundus fluorescein angiography and fundus photography grading criteria for early diabetic retinopathy.
Li XY; Wang S; Dong L; Zhang H
Int J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(2):261-267. PubMed ID: 35186686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of diabetic retinopathy from fluorescein angiograms. ETDRS report number 11. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.
Ophthalmology; 1991 May; 98(5 Suppl):807-22. PubMed ID: 2062514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Localized retinal morphology and differential light sensitivity in diabetic retinopathy. Methodology and clinical results.
Bek T
Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1992; (207):1-36. PubMed ID: 1486330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year follow-up of blood-retinal barrier and retinal thickness alterations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild nonproliferative retinopathy.
Lobo CL; Bernardes RC; de Abreu JR; Cunha-Vaz JG
Arch Ophthalmol; 2001 Oct; 119(10):1469-74. PubMed ID: 11594946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential distribution of manifest lesions in diabetic retinopathy by fundus fluorescein angiography and fundus photography.
Li X; Xie J; Zhang L; Cui Y; Zhang G; Wang J; Zhang A; Chen X; Huang T; Meng Q
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 20(1):471. PubMed ID: 33261573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
Kinyoun JL; Martin DC; Fujimoto WY; Leonetti DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema.
Yang Y; Vitale S; Ding Y; O'Connell SR; Alexander J; Bressler NM; Schachat AP; Zeimer R
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 12569999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Soliman AZ; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 23778092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrawide-field fluorescein angiography for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Kong M; Lee MY; Ham DI
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2012 Dec; 26(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 23204797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
