96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9801200)
1. On the performance and cost-effectiveness of semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening.
Vooijs GP
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 9801200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary comparison of papanicolaou smear and speculoscopy for assessing cervical cancer precursor lesions in pregnant adolescents.
Shulman LP; Klett CC; Phillips OP
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 1999 May; 12(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 10326192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stanley F. Patten, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. and the development of an automated Papanicolaou smear screening system.
Lee JS; Nelson AC
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):332-6. PubMed ID: 9438457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What should be done when the Pap smear report is 'inconclusive, possible adenocarcinoma in situ'.
Saville M
Pathology; 2003 Jun; 35(3):197. PubMed ID: 14506960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The history of the Papanicolaou smear and the odyssey of George and Andromache Papanicolaou.
Vilos GA
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 91(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 9491881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of Papanicolaou smears in a black hospital.
Miller JM; Chambers DC; Bennett HB; Miller JM
J Natl Med Assoc; 1986 May; 78(5):439-40. PubMed ID: 3712481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervicography--an adjunct to Papanicolaou screening.
Ferris DG
Am Fam Physician; 1994 Aug; 50(2):363-70. PubMed ID: 8042572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The costs, clinical benefits, and cost-effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in HIV-infected women.
Goldie SJ; Weinstein MC; Kuntz KM; Freedberg KA
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jan; 130(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 10068381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears.
Meerding WJ; Doornewaard H; van Ballegooijen M; Bos A; van der Graaf Y; van den Tweel JG; van der Schouw YT; Habbema JD
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-assisted cervical cancer screening using neural networks.
Mango LJ
Cancer Lett; 1994 Mar; 77(2-3):155-62. PubMed ID: 8168062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Is there a benefit to continue pap smear screening for cervical cancer after 65 years of age? A retrospective study on 53,644 women].
Meyer R; Lemay AL; Guy X; Giraud C; Mathevet P; Flori M
Bull Cancer; 2012 Apr; 99(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 22450525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of panendomicroscopy in the detection and evaluation of cervical premalignant and malignant conditions. A preliminary report.
Raju KS; Ohkawa K
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1985; 6(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 2414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pap smear refined.
Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Papanicolaou smear.
Baldwin KA; Goodwin K
J Nurse Midwifery; 1985; 30(6):327-32. PubMed ID: 3854352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rescreening of cervical Papanicolaou smears using PAPNET.
Schechter CB
JAMA; 1998 Jun; 279(22):1787; author reply 1787-8. PubMed ID: 9628708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rescreening of cervical Papanicolaou smears using PAPNET.
Mango LJ; Radensky PW
JAMA; 1998 Jun; 279(22):1786-7; author reply 1787-8. PubMed ID: 9628707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rescreening of cervical Papanicolaou smears using PAPNET.
Koss LG
JAMA; 1998 Jun; 279(22):1786; author reply 1787-8. PubMed ID: 9628706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Modified endocervical vaginal smear for diagnosis of endocervical microinvasive cervix carcinoma].
Melsheimer P; Hahn U; Herberling D; Wallwiener D; Rummel HH; Bastert G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(11):608-10. PubMed ID: 8533497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use effectiveness of the Cytobrush in the primary care setting.
Cauthen DB; Cullison M; Symm B; Peterson RF
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1992; 5(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 1496891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
