These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9801201)
1. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing. Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Lorincz AT; Herrero R; Hutchinson ML; Bratti C; Zahniser D; Morales J; Hildesheim A; Helgesen K; Kelly D; Alfaro M; Mena F; Balmaceda I; Mango L; Greenberg M Cancer; 1997 Apr; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Hutchinson ML; Zahniser DJ; Sherman ME; Herrero R; Alfaro M; Bratti MC; Hildesheim A; Lorincz AT; Greenberg MD; Morales J; Schiffman M Cancer; 1999 Apr; 87(2):48-55. PubMed ID: 10227593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer. Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy. Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System. Biscotti CV; Dawson AE; Dziura B; Galup L; Darragh T; Rahemtulla A; Wills-Frank L Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 15842055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PAPNET-assisted primary screening of conventional cervical smears. Cenci M; Nagar C; Vecchione A Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3887-9. PubMed ID: 11268471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer]. Hølund B; Ejersbo D; Hjortebjerg A Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated screening for quality control using PAPNET: a study of 638 negative Pap smears. Keyhani-Rofagha S; Palma T; O'Toole RV Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 8725131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory]. Ghidoni D; Fabbris E; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Medri M; Bucchi L; Bondi A Pathologica; 1998 Aug; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study. Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Costs and outcomes of PAPNET secondary screening technology for cervical cytologic evaluation. A community hospital's experience. Brotzman GL; Kretzchmar S; Ferguson D; Gottlieb M; Stowe C Arch Fam Med; 1999; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9932072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rescreen effect in conventional and PAPNET screening: observed in a study using material enriched with positive smears. van Ballegooijen M; Beck S; Boon ME; Boer R; Habbema JD Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(5):1133-8. PubMed ID: 9755670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resolving ASCUS without recourse to HPV testing: manual reprocessing of residual automated liquid-based cytology (ALBC) material using manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC). Maksem JA; Bedrossian CW; Kurtycz D; Sewall S; Shalkham J; Dhanwada V; Lind H; Bibbo M; Weidmann J; Kane B; Shi Fu Y Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 16299747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The PAPNET system in cytological rescreening of cervical smears]. Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Apr; 49(4):139-45. PubMed ID: 9206764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. HPV testing: where are we now? Bovicelli A; Bristow RE; Montz FJ Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(6C):4673-80. PubMed ID: 11205199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy. O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PAPNET-directed rescreening of cervicovaginal smears: a study of 101 cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Ryan MR; Stastny JF; Remmers R; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Frable WJ Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 105(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 8659445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the performance and cost-effectiveness of semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening. Vooijs GP Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 9801200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]