These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9802230)

  • 1. Deception and deception detection: the role of cross-modal inconsistency.
    Heinrich CU; Borkenau P
    J Pers; 1998 Oct; 66(5):687-712. PubMed ID: 9802230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
    Bond CF; Depaulo BM
    Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motivational cues: the role of perceived senders' self-control ability in raters' deception judgements.
    Wu S; Zou H; Cai W; Wang X; Jin S
    Int J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 49(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 24811883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The agreeableness asymmetry in first impressions: perceivers' impulse to (mis)judge agreeableness and how it is moderated by power.
    Ames DR; Bianchi EC
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1719-36. PubMed ID: 18784327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Credibility judgements of detectives: the impact of nonverbal behavior, social skills, and physical characteristics on impression formation.
    Vrij A
    J Soc Psychol; 1993 Oct; 133(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 8283858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting deception in facial expressions of pain: accuracy and training.
    Hill ML; Craig KD
    Clin J Pain; 2004; 20(6):415-22. PubMed ID: 15502685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting lies through others' eyes: Children use perceptual access cues to evaluate listeners' beliefs about informants' deception.
    Tay C; Ng R; Ye NN; Ding XP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2024 May; 241():105863. PubMed ID: 38306738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality judgments based on physical appearance.
    Naumann LP; Vazire S; Rentfrow PJ; Gosling SD
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Dec; 35(12):1661-71. PubMed ID: 19762717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dual lens model: a comprehensive framework for understanding self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance.
    Hirschmüller S; Egloff B; Nestler S; Back MD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):335-53. PubMed ID: 23046068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The motor cost of telling lies: electrocortical signatures and personality foundations of spontaneous deception.
    Panasiti MS; Pavone EF; Mancini A; Merla A; Grisoni L; Aglioti SM
    Soc Neurosci; 2014; 9(6):573-89. PubMed ID: 24979665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deception detection from written accounts.
    Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpersonal orientation and the accuracy of personality judgments.
    Vogt DS; Colvin CR
    J Pers; 2003 Apr; 71(2):267-95. PubMed ID: 12693518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The truth about lying.
    Turri A; Turri J
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():161-8. PubMed ID: 25754242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE, DISSIMULATION, AND RESPONSE STYLES.
    LIBERTY PG
    J Consult Psychol; 1964 Dec; 28():529-37. PubMed ID: 14242314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social desirability and self-reports: testing models of socially desirable responding.
    Holtgraves T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Feb; 30(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 15030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting deceptive behaviour after the fact.
    von Hippel W; Baker E; Wilson R; Brin L; Page L
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 55(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 26390987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting Observers' Accuracy when Assessing Credibility: The Effect of the Interaction between Media, Senders' Competence and Veracity.
    Caso L; Maricchiolo F; Livi S; Vrij A; Palena N
    Span J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 21():E49. PubMed ID: 30419998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.