97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9802252)
1. When is a lifting movement too asymmetric to identify low-back loading by 2-D analysis?
Kingma I; de Looze MP; van Dieën JH; Toussaint HM; Adams MA; Baten CT
Ergonomics; 1998 Oct; 41(10):1453-61. PubMed ID: 9802252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comments on 'Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist'.
Plamondon A; Gagnon M; Gravel D
J Biomech; 1999 Jun; 32(6):635, 637-8. PubMed ID: 10332629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of slouching and lumbar support on iliolumbar ligaments, intervertebral discs and sacroiliac joints.
Snijders CJ; Hermans PF; Niesing R; Spoor CW; Stoeckart R
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 15109750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the asymmetry multiplier in the 1991 NIOSH lifting equation adequately control the biomechanical loading of the spine?
Lavender SA; Li YC; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19308820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.
Marras WS; Davis KG
Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical response of a lumbar intervertebral disc to manual lifting activities: a poroelastic finite element model study.
Natarajan RN; Lavender SA; An HA; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):1958-65. PubMed ID: 18708928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of backpacks on the lumbar spine in children: a standing magnetic resonance imaging study.
Neuschwander TB; Cutrone J; Macias BR; Cutrone S; Murthy G; Chambers H; Hargens AR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 20023607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of 3-D peak L5/S1 joint moment during asymmetric lifting tasks with cubic spline interpolation of segment Euler angles.
Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21529774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic versus static analyses of lifting a box from the floor.
Menzer HM; Reiser RF
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():305-10. PubMed ID: 15850123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist.
Kingma I; van Dieën JH; de Looze M; Toussaint HM; Dolan P; Baten CT
J Biomech; 1998 Jun; 31(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 9755037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpolation of segment Euler angles can provide a robust estimation of segment angular trajectories during asymmetric lifting tasks.
Xu X; Chang CC; Faber GS; Kingma I; Dennerlein JT
J Biomech; 2010 Jul; 43(10):2043-8. PubMed ID: 20378116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Load knowledge affects low-back loading and control of balance in lifting tasks.
Commissaris DA; Toussaint HM
Ergonomics; 1997 May; 40(5):559-75. PubMed ID: 9149555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of action forces and posture to determine the lumbar load of healthcare workers during care activities with patient transfers.
Theilmeier A; Jordan C; Luttmann A; Jäger M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Nov; 54(8):923-33. PubMed ID: 20851849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of foot movement and an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading during free-dynamic symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions.
Marras WS; Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG
Ergonomics; 2000 May; 43(5):653-68. PubMed ID: 10877482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postural effects on biomechanical and psychophysical weight-lifting limits.
Chaffin DB; Page GB
Ergonomics; 1994 Apr; 37(4):663-76. PubMed ID: 8187750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes.
Kumar S; Garand D
Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):861-80. PubMed ID: 1633793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Force direction and physical load in dynamic pushing and pulling.
de Looze MP; van Greuningen K; Rebel J; Kingma I; Kuijer PP
Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 10755660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the trunk movement more perturbed after an asymmetric than after a symmetric perturbation during lifting?
van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
J Biomech; 2004 Jul; 37(7):1071-7. PubMed ID: 15165877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of back motion during asymmetric lifting.
Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Waters TR
Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):845-59. PubMed ID: 1633792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
Jäger M; Luttmann A
Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
