BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9802349)

  • 1. Bile duct brushing cytology: statistical analysis of proposed diagnostic criteria.
    Renshaw AA; Madge R; Jiroutek M; Granter SR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Nov; 110(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 9802349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.
    Volmar KE; Vollmer RT; Routbort MJ; Creager AJ
    Cancer; 2006 Aug; 108(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 16541448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic criteria for malignancy in bile cytology and its usefulness.
    Jin YH; Kim SH; Park CK
    J Korean Med Sci; 1999 Dec; 14(6):643-7. PubMed ID: 10642942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the ThinPrep method in bile duct brushings: analysis of morphologic parameters associated with malignancy and determination of interobserver reliability.
    Waugh MS; Guy CD; Maygarden SJ; Livasy CA; Jones CK; Volmar KE
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2008 Sep; 36(9):651-6. PubMed ID: 18677761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cytomorphologic characteristics of next-generation sequencing-positive bile duct brushing specimens.
    Rosenbaum MW; Arpin R; Limbocker J; Casey B; Le L; Dudley J; Iafrate AJ; Pitman MB
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):520-527. PubMed ID: 32839152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic bile duct brushing of malignant pancreatic biliary strictures: retrospective study with comparison of conventional smear and ThinPrep techniques.
    Ylagan LR; Liu LH; Maluf HM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 12672095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings.
    Siddiqui MT; Gokaslan ST; Saboorian MH; Carrick K; Ashfaq R
    Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 12925981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.
    Avadhani V; Hacihasanoglu E; Memis B; Pehlivanoglu B; Hanley KZ; Krishnamurti U; Krasinskas AM; Osunkoya AO; Daniels LM; Freedman AA; Goodman M; Adsay V; Reid MD
    Mod Pathol; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1273-1286. PubMed ID: 28664934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing.
    Krishnamurthy S; Katz RL; Shumate A; Strohlein K; Khanna A; Tucker SL; Raijman I; Lahoti S
    Cancer; 2001 Jun; 93(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 11391612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Performance of Bile Duct Brush Cytology with Risk of Malignancy of Standardized Categories in the Wake of World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Rath A; Pradeep I; Nigam JS
    Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(6):639-649. PubMed ID: 37879315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. UroVysion Multi-Target Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Assay for the Detection of Malignant Bile Duct Brushing Specimens: A Comparison with Routine Cytology.
    Zhai J
    Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 29734171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brush cytology of the extrahepatic biliary tract: comparison of cytologic features of adenocarcinoma and benign biliary strictures.
    Cohen MB; Wittchow RJ; Johlin FC; Bottles K; Raab SS
    Mod Pathol; 1995 Jun; 8(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 7675767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in atypical and negative bile duct brushing cytology specimens with malignant outcome: are "false-negative" cytologic findings a representation of morphologically subtle molecular alterations?
    Krishnamurti U; Sasatomi E; Swalsky PA; Finkelstein SD; Ohori NP
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Jan; 131(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17227126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma on bile duct brushings in the presence of stent associated changes: A retrospective analysis.
    Goyal A; Sharaiha RZ; Alperstein SA; Siddiqui MT
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Oct; 46(10):826-832. PubMed ID: 30144340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of malignant cytologic criteria in pancreatobiliary brushings with corresponding positive fluorescence in situ hybridization results.
    Barr Fritcher EG; Caudill JL; Blue JE; Djuric K; Feipel L; Maritim BK; Ragheb AA; Halling KC; Henry MR; Clayton AC
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Sep; 136(3):442-9. PubMed ID: 21846921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The outcomes of "atypical" and "suspicious" bile duct brushings in the identification of pancreaticobiliary tumors: Follow-up analysis of surgical resection specimens.
    Choi WT; Swanson PE; Grieco VS; Wang D; Westerhoff M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 26221777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.
    Kipp BR; Stadheim LM; Halling SA; Pochron NL; Harmsen S; Nagorney DM; Sebo TJ; Therneau TM; Gores GJ; de Groen PC; Baron TH; Levy MJ; Halling KC; Roberts LR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1675-81. PubMed ID: 15330900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver reproducibility and agreement with original diagnosis in the categories "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" for bile and pancreatic duct brushings.
    Layfield LJ; Schmidt RL; Chadwick BE; Esebua M; Witt BL
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Oct; 43(10):797-801. PubMed ID: 26153872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatobiliary disorders: a multicenter clinical experience (with video).
    Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Kommaraju K; Zhu X; Hebert-Magee S; Hawes RH; Vargo JJ; Varadarajulu S; Parsi MA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Oct; 84(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 26995690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond cytomorphology: expanding the diagnostic potential for biliary cytology.
    Chadwick BE
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jun; 40(6):536-41. PubMed ID: 22619128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.