164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9802657)
1. Bilateral total hip arthroplasty comparing hydroxyapatite coating to porous-coated fixation.
Dorr LD; Wan Z; Song M; Ranawat A
J Arthroplasty; 1998 Oct; 13(7):729-36. PubMed ID: 9802657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized trial of hydroxyapatite coated prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
Yee AJ; Kreder HK; Bookman I; Davey JR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Sep; (366):120-32. PubMed ID: 10627726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of proximal porous-coated and grit-blasted surfaces of hydroxyapatite-coated stems.
Won YY; Dorr LD; Wan Z
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 14711954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of hydroxyapatite coating on the radio-clinical results of a grit-blasted titanium alloy femoral taper. A case-control study of 198 cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with the Alloclassic™ system.
Delaunay C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Nov; 100(7):739-44. PubMed ID: 25261173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is hydroxyapatite coating necessary to improve survivorship of porous-coated titanium femoral stem?
Kim YH; Kim JS; Joo JH; Park JW
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 21855271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of porous-coated titanium femoral stems with and without hydroxyapatite coating.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Oh SH; Kim JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1682-8. PubMed ID: 12954825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of hydroxyapatite- and porous-coated stems in total hip replacement.
Park YS; Lee JY; Yun SH; Jung MW; Oh I
Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Jun; 74(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 12899544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydroxyapatite-coated titanium porous plasma spray tapered stem: experience at 15 to 18 years.
Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Mallory TH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():81-5. PubMed ID: 17312587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hydroxyapatite-coated proximal ingrowth femoral stems. A matched pair control study.
McPherson EJ; Dorr LD; Gruen TA; Saberi MT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jun; (315):223-30. PubMed ID: 7634671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
Landor I; Vavrík P; Jahoda D; Pokorný D; Ballay R; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years.
Scott DF; Jaffe WL
J Arthroplasty; 1996 Jun; 11(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 8792250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective randomized study comparing electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite on titanium stems.
Bøe BG; Röhrl SM; Heier T; Snorrason F; Nordsletten L
Acta Orthop; 2011 Feb; 82(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 21189109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial.
Tanzer M; Kantor S; Rosenthall L; Bobyn JD
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Aug; 16(5):552-8. PubMed ID: 11503113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of a highly porous titanium cup (Tritanium) and a conventional hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium cup: A retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes in hip arthroplasty among Japanese patients.
Yoshioka S; Nakano S; Kinoshita Y; Nakamura M; Goto T; Hamada D; Sairyo K
J Orthop Sci; 2018 Nov; 23(6):967-972. PubMed ID: 30055877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Highly Porous Titanium Cups versus Hydroxyapatite-Coated Sockets: Midterm Results in Metachronous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Castagnini F; Bordini B; Yorifuji M; Giardina F; Natali S; Pardo F; Traina F
Med Princ Pract; 2019; 28(6):559-565. PubMed ID: 31079112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Different Materials and Proximal Coatings Used for Femoral Components in One-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Miyatake K; Jinno T; Koga D; Yamauchi Y; Muneta T; Okawa A
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2237-41. PubMed ID: 26190568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Grit-blasted and hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty: an 11- to 14-year follow-up study.
Miyakawa S; Kawamura H; Mishima H; Yasumoto J
J Orthop Sci; 2004; 9(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 15449121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation of different fixation principles.
Thanner J
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1999 Aug; 286():1-41. PubMed ID: 10572504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry.
Kärrholm J; Anderberg C; Snorrason F; Thanner J; Langeland N; Malchau H; Herberts P
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Sep; 84(9):1651-8. PubMed ID: 12208924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
