101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9804007)
1. Automation system of X-ray filter in digital subtraction angiography.
Akaishi T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1998; 57(1-2):111-4. PubMed ID: 9804007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Filter wheel equalization in DSA: simulation results.
Boone JM; Gardiner GA; Levin DC
Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):439-48. PubMed ID: 8497236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization of beam parameters for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
Van Lysel MS
Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 8177154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Affine transformation-based automatic registration for peripheral digital subtraction angiography (DSA)].
Kong G; Dai DQ; Zou LM
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 32(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 18973035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive digital energy subtraction angiography with a channeling-radiation x-ray source.
Gary CK; Piestrup MA; Boyers DG; Pincus CI; Pantell RH; Rothbart GB
Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1527-35. PubMed ID: 8289737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of standard- and low-tube voltage 320-detector row volume CT angiography in detection of intracranial aneurysms with digital subtraction angiography as gold standard.
Sun G; Ding J; Lu Y; Li M; Li L; Li GY; Zhang XP
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 22206609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a noise reduction imaging technology in iliac digital subtraction angiography: noninferior clinical image quality with lower patient and scatter dose.
van Strijen MJ; Grünhagen T; Mauti M; Zähringer M; Gaines PA; Robinson GJ; Railton NJ; van Overhagen H; Habraken J; van Leersum M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 May; 26(5):642-50.e1. PubMed ID: 25770373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonlinear geometric warping of the mask image: a new method for reducing misregistration artifacts in digital subtraction angiography.
Hayashi N; Sakai T; Kitagawa M; Inagaki R; Sadato N; Ishii Y; Nishimoto Y; Tanaka M; Fukushima T; Komuro H; Ogura H; Kobayashi H; Kubota T
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1998; 21(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 9502681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. X-ray digital subtraction angiography to magnetic resonance-digital subtraction angiography using three-dimensional TRICKS. Historical perspective and computer simulations: a review.
Mistretta CA; Grist TM
Invest Radiol; 1998 Sep; 33(9):496-505. PubMed ID: 9766033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Area x-ray beam equalization for digital angiography.
Molloi S; Tang J; Mather T; Zhou Y
Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2684-92. PubMed ID: 10619254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between the pixel value in digital subtraction angiography and iodine concentration: study in high iodine concentration with original phantom.
Chida K; Sai M; Saito H; Takase K; Zuguchi M; Sasaki M; Sato T
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2000 Mar; 190(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 10778800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [An invariant approach for image registration in digital subtraction angiography].
Wang JL; Wang BH
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 30(1):15-8, 14. PubMed ID: 16646418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital subtraction peripheral angiography using image stacking: initial clinical results.
Kump KS; Sachs PB; Wilson DL
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1482-92. PubMed ID: 11488582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of head dual energy computed tomography angiography and neuro digital subtraction angiography].
Xu Y; Wen L; Han D; Ma CW
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 32(6):699-703. PubMed ID: 21219804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flow impairment during filter-protected carotid artery stent placement: frame-by-frame evaluation of digital subtraction angiography images.
Sorimachi T; Nishino K; Morita K; Sasaki O; Koike T; Ito Y; Fujii Y
World Neurosurg; 2011; 76(3-4):282-7; discussion 250-2. PubMed ID: 21986425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significant dose reduction for pediatric digital subtraction angiography without impairing image quality: preclinical study in a piglet model.
Racadio J; Strauss K; Abruzzo T; Patel M; Kukreja K; Johnson N; den Hartog M; Hoornaert B; Nachabe R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):904-8. PubMed ID: 25247959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A theoretical comparison of x-ray angiographic image quality using energy-dependent and conventional subtraction methods.
Tanguay J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 22225282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
