174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9804227)
1. A survey of anonymous oocyte donors: demographics.
Kan AK; Abdalla HI; Ogunyemi BO; Korea L; Latarche E
Hum Reprod; 1998 Oct; 13(1O):2762-6. PubMed ID: 9804227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.
Kenney NJ; McGowan ML
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 19022427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences.
Jordan CB; Belar CD; Williams RS
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun; 25(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 15715037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.
Söderström-Anttila V; Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Poranen AK; Sälevaara M; Suikkari AM
Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):597-606. PubMed ID: 26724795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment.
Fielding D; Handley S; Duqueno L; Weaver S; Lui S
J Community Appl Soc Psychol; 1998; 8(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 15452938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Views of French oocyte donors at least 3 years after donation.
Cordier C; Ducrocq B; Fry J; Catteau-Jonard S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jun; 40(6):819-826. PubMed ID: 32295744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.
Greenfeld DA; Mazure CM; Olive DL; Keefe DL
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Feb; 12(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 7670269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation.
McMahon CA; Saunders DM
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jan; 91(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 18053994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative assessment of pre- and post-donation attitudes towards potential oocyte and embryo disposition and management among ovum donors in an oocyte donation programme.
Zweifel JE; Rathert MA; Klock SC; Walaski HP; Pritts EA; Olive DL; Lindheim SR
Hum Reprod; 2006 May; 21(5):1325-7. PubMed ID: 16410332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes and intentions towards volunteer oocyte donation.
Purewal S; van den Akker OB
Reprod Biomed Online; 2009; 19 Suppl 1():19-26. PubMed ID: 19622246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "They were my eggs; they were her babies": known oocyte donors' conceptualizations of their reproductive material.
Blyth E; Yee S; Tsang AK
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Nov; 33(11):1134-40. PubMed ID: 22082787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues.
Kramer W; Schneider J; Schultz N
Hum Reprod; 2009 Dec; 24(12):3144-9. PubMed ID: 19729378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rethinking gamete donor care: A satisfaction survey of egg and sperm donors in the UK.
Williams RA; Machin LL
PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199971. PubMed ID: 30036373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Egg-sharing, consent and exploitation: examining donors' and recipients' circumstances and retrospective reflections.
Gürtin ZB; Ahuja KK; Golombok S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Jun; 24(7):698-708. PubMed ID: 22503266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
Svanberg AS; Sydsjö G; Bladh M; Lampic C
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Young Women’s Attitudes Towards Modern Reproductive Practices: A Survey Study Assessing What Young Women Want.
Druckenmiller S; DeVore S; Knopman JM; Noyes N
J Reprod Med; 2017; 62(3-4):111-18. PubMed ID: 30230301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation.
Yee S; Blyth E; Tsang AK
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec; 23(7):851-9. PubMed ID: 22019613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Egg donation for stem cell research: ideas of surplus and deficit in Australian IVF patients' and reproductive donors' accounts.
Waldby C; Carroll K
Sociol Health Illn; 2012 May; 34(4):513-28. PubMed ID: 21951180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
