136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9804404)
1. US panel split on endocrine disruptors..
Macilwain C
Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6705):828. PubMed ID: 9804404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency procedures and policies to estimate risk of injury to the male reproductive system.
Francis EZ
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 302():3-16; discussion 17-20. PubMed ID: 2755956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endocrine disrupter verdict left open.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1999 Aug; 400(6745):607. PubMed ID: 10458152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Endocrine disrupters as a public health issue.
Carpenter H
Minn Med; 2003 Jan; 86(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 12585556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US panel established to coordinate work on endocrine disrupters.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1996 Jul; 382(6587):100. PubMed ID: 8700191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental health. Debate continues over safety of water spiked with rocket fuel.
Stokstad E
Science; 2005 Jan; 307(5709):507. PubMed ID: 15681361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. US guidelines on way, but agreement on health impact of endocrine disrupters still lacking.
Sibbald B
CMAJ; 1998 Aug; 159(3):261-2. PubMed ID: 9724985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental health. Second look at arsenic finds higher risk.
Kaiser J
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2189. PubMed ID: 11567118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Advances in EDC testing.
J Environ Monit; 2000 Dec; 2(6):97N. PubMed ID: 11296775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond screening: problems and prospects for risk characterization of endocrine disruptors.
Rhomberg L
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Aug; 26(1 Pt 1):74-9. PubMed ID: 9339483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pesticide testing on humans is ethical, science panel says.
Vedantam S
Washington Post; 2004 Feb; ():A3. PubMed ID: 15022674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental health. Academy to mediate debate over rocket-fuel contaminants.
Renner R
Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5614):1829. PubMed ID: 12649455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of extant community-based epidemiologic studies on health effects of hazardous wastes.
Miller AB
Toxicol Ind Health; 1996; 12(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 8794535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Endocrine disruptor risk characterization: an EPA perspective.
Fenner-Crisp PA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Aug; 26(1 Pt 1):70-3. PubMed ID: 9339482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toxicology. Academy panel mulls ethics of human pesticide experiments.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5605):327-9. PubMed ID: 12531989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genes may solve hormone-disrupter debate.
Triendl R
Nature; 2001 Jan; 409(6818):274. PubMed ID: 11201709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hormone mimics: they're in our food; should we worry?
Consum Rep; 1998 Jun; 63(6):52-5. PubMed ID: 10342960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A treatise on hazards of endocrine disruptors and tool to evaluate them.
Roy P; Pereira BM
Indian J Exp Biol; 2005 Nov; 43(11):975-92. PubMed ID: 16313061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toxicology. E.U. shifts endocrine disrupter research into overdrive.
Lorenz S
Science; 2003 May; 300(5622):1069. PubMed ID: 12750489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
