These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9805117)

  • 21. Comparison of continuous thermodilution and bolus cardiac output measurements in septic shock.
    Sun Q; Rogiers P; Pauwels D; Vincent JL
    Intensive Care Med; 2002 Sep; 28(9):1276-80. PubMed ID: 12209277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Room temperature injectate and iced injectate for cardiac output: a comparative study.
    Lyons K; Dalbow M
    Crit Care Nurse; 1986; 6(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 3633791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Reliability of cardiac output by thermodilution. Effect of marker temperature].
    Tarradell Zamora RM; Alvarez Escudero J; Correa López J; Galán Serrano J; Villar Landeira JM
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 1991; 38(3):167-9. PubMed ID: 1961961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cardiac output measurement by thermodilution.
    Pelletier C
    Can J Surg; 1979 Jul; 22(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 156578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of injectate temperature and thermistor position on reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output determinations.
    Williams JE; Pfau SE; Deckelbaum LI
    Chest; 1994 Sep; 106(3):895-8. PubMed ID: 8082374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducibility and accuracy of using room-temperature vs. ice-temperature injectate for thermodilution cardiac output determination.
    Shellock FG; Riedinger MS
    Heart Lung; 1983 Mar; 12(2):175-6. PubMed ID: 6550049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cardiac output determination by the thermodilution method: comparison of ice-temperature injectate versus room temperature injectate contained in prefilled syringes or a closed injectate system.
    Heart Lung; 1986 Jan; 15(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 3632962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
    Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Injectate port selection affects accuracy and reproducibility of cardiac output measurements with multiport thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters.
    Renner LE; Meyer LT
    Am J Crit Care; 1994 Jan; 3(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 8118493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Room-temperature vs iced saline indicator injection for transpulmonary thermodilution.
    Huber W; Kraski T; Haller B; Mair S; Saugel B; Beitz A; Schmid RM; Malbrain ML
    J Crit Care; 2014 Dec; 29(6):1133.e7-1133.e14. PubMed ID: 25240464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cardiac output by thermodilution technique. Effect of injectate's volume and temperature on accuracy and reproducibility in the critically Ill patient.
    Elkayam U; Berkley R; Azen S; Weber L; Geva B; Henry WL
    Chest; 1983 Oct; 84(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 6352195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Agreement and clinical utility of 2 techniques for measuring cardiac output in patients with low cardiac output.
    Albert NM; Spear BT; Hammel J
    Am J Crit Care; 1999 Jan; 8(1):464-74. PubMed ID: 9987544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of methods of cardiac output measurement.
    Woog RH; McWilliam DB
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1983 May; 11(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 6346941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pulsed dye densitometry with two different sensor types for cardiac output measurement after cardiac surgery: a comparison with the thermodilution technique.
    Hofer CK; Bühlmann S; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):653-7. PubMed ID: 15101865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of continuous thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients with analysis of systematic errors.
    Medin DL; Brown DT; Wesley R; Cunnion RE; Ognibene FP
    J Crit Care; 1998 Dec; 13(4):184-9. PubMed ID: 9869545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Thermodilution cardiac output--are three injections enough?
    Nilsson LB; Nilsson JC; Skovgaard LT; Berthelsen PG
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 Nov; 48(10):1322-7. PubMed ID: 15504196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Thermodilution right ventricular ejection fraction measurements: room temperature versus cold temperature injectate.
    Safcsak K; Nelson LD
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Jul; 22(7):1136-41. PubMed ID: 8026203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and thermodilution techniques for the measurement of cardiac output.
    Zoremba N; Bickenbach J; Krauss B; Rossaint R; Kuhlen R; Schälte G
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Nov; 51(10):1314-9. PubMed ID: 17944633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output measurements.
    Kadota LT
    Heart Lung; 1986 Nov; 15(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 3639861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Issues in methods and measurement of thermodilution cardiac output.
    Sommers MS; Woods SL; Courtade MA
    Nurs Res; 1993; 42(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 8337161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.