89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9805599)
1. The 'special verdict'.
Robertson S
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1998 Oct; 32(5):730. PubMed ID: 9805599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Failed agency and the insanity defence.
Matthews S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2004; 27(5):413-24. PubMed ID: 15337360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. "Reasonable medical certainty": can we meet Daubert standards in insanity cases?
Poythress NG
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 15515909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Insanity' law in New Zealand.
Brinded PM
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1999 Aug; 33(4):604-6. PubMed ID: 10483864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The irrelevance of the medical model of mental illness to law and ethics.
Greenberg AS; Bailey JM
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(2):153-73. PubMed ID: 8050840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Voluntariness, intention, and the defence of mental disorder: toward a rational approach.
McSherry B
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):581-99. PubMed ID: 14502690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mens rea.
Carson DC; Felthous AR
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):559-62. PubMed ID: 14502688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Intoxication and responsibility.
Shiner RA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1990; 13(1-2):9-35. PubMed ID: 2210933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Without thinking: impulsive aggression and criminal responsibility.
Shuman DW; Gold LH
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(6):723-34. PubMed ID: 19039791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. GENDER ROLE OF INCONGRUENCE AND THE ADJUDICATION OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY.
Veysey BM
Albany Law Rev; 2015; 78(3):1087-107. PubMed ID: 26245003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Responses to 'the "special verdict"'.
O'Brien KP
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1999 Aug; 33(4):603-4. PubMed ID: 10483863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Response to 'the "special verdict"'.
Simpson AI
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1999 Aug; 33(4):606. PubMed ID: 10483865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Judgment of legal insanity].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2007 Nov; 3(134):2692. PubMed ID: 18159707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
Czerner F
Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The iller the killer, the worse the purpose.
Gordon AG
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(4):683-6. PubMed ID: 9894225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience.
Aharoni E; Funk C; Sinnott-Armstrong W; Gazzaniga M
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Mar; 1124():145-60. PubMed ID: 18400929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.
Covey RD
Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental responsibility.
Mackay of the Clashfern Lord
Med Sci Law; 1998 Oct; 38(4):281-2. PubMed ID: 9808938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Slater Method.
Wall BW; Krupp BH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):525-6. PubMed ID: 14974810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary: Update on assessing risk for violence among stalkers.
Schwartz-Watts DM; Rowell CN
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):440-3. PubMed ID: 14974799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
