947 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9805724)
21. Integrating services involves cost issues.
Blaney CL
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1998; 18(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 12293237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The MONARCH intervention to enhance the quality of antenatal and postnatal primary health services in rural South Africa: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Chetty T; Yapa HMN; Herbst C; Geldsetzer P; Naidu KK; De Neve JW; Herbst K; Matthews P; Pillay D; Wyke S; Bärnighausen T;
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):625. PubMed ID: 30089485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Economic evaluation of Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) in South Asian and African countries: a study protocol.
Khowaja AR; Mitton C; Bryan S; Magee LA; Bhutta ZA; von Dadelszen P
Implement Sci; 2015 May; 10():76. PubMed ID: 26007682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Who should provide routine antenatal care for low-risk women, and how often? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group.
Khan-Neelofur D; Gülmezoglu M; Villar J
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 1998 Oct; 12 Suppl 2():7-26. PubMed ID: 9805721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Economic evaluations and randomized trials in spinal disorders: principles and methods.
Korthals-de Bos I; van Tulder M; van Dieten H; Bouter L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 15094541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Over-, under- and misuse of pain treatment in Germany.
Dietl M; Korczak D
GMS Health Technol Assess; 2011 Apr; 7():Doc03. PubMed ID: 21522485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Maternity care in developing countries: relevance of new technological advances.
Faundes A; Rosenfield A; Pinotti JA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1988 Jun; 26(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 2900161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Another view on Norplant: match method with users.
Herndon N
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):24-6. PubMed ID: 12286081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prenatal care in primary health care centers of Al Hassa, Saudi Arabia.
al Teheawy MM
J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 1992; 67(1-2):37-51. PubMed ID: 1295949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The costs of alternative types of routine antenatal care for low-risk women: shared care vs care by general practitioners and community midwives.
Ratcliffe J; Ryan M; Tucker J
J Health Serv Res Policy; 1996 Jul; 1(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 10180859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost analysis serves many purposes.
Finger WR
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1998; 18(2):16-9. PubMed ID: 12293235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Analysis of costs and cost-effectiveness in multinational trials.
Koopmanschap MA; Touw KC; Rutten FF
Health Policy; 2001 Nov; 58(2):175-86. PubMed ID: 11551665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An holistic economic evaluation of an Aboriginal community-controlled midwifery programme in Western Sydney.
Jan S; Conaty S; Hecker R; Bartlett M; Delaney S; Capon T
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2004 Jan; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 15006235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Mobile Health Intervention for Patients With Depressive Symptoms: Protocol for an Economic Evaluation Alongside Two Randomized Trials in Brazil and Peru.
Vera Cruz Dos Santos D; Coelho de Soárez P; Cavero V; U Rocha TI; Aschar S; Daley KL; Garcia Claro H; Abud Scotton G; Fernandes I; Diez-Canseco F; Brandt LR; Toyama M; Martins Castro HC; Miranda JJ; Araya R; Quayle J; Rossi Menezes P
JMIR Res Protoc; 2021 Oct; 10(10):e26164. PubMed ID: 34643538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Antenatal care in rural Bangladesh: current state of costs, content and recommendations for effective service delivery.
Jo Y; Alland K; Ali H; Mehra S; LeFevre AE; Pak SE; Shaikh S; Christian P; Labrique AB
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Nov; 19(1):861. PubMed ID: 31752841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measuring fidelity, feasibility, costs: an implementation evaluation of a cluster-controlled trial of group antenatal care in rural Nepal.
Harsha Bangura A; Nirola I; Thapa P; Citrin D; Belbase B; Bogati B; B K N; Khadka S; Kunwar L; Halliday S; Choudhury N; Schwarz R; Adhikari M; Kalaunee SP; Rising S; Maru D; Maru S
Reprod Health; 2020 Jan; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 31952543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Incremental cost and health gains of the 2016 WHO antenatal care recommendations for Rwanda: results from expert elicitation.
Hitimana R; Lindholm L; Mogren I; Krantz G; Nzayirambaho M; Sengoma JS; Pulkki-Brännström AM
Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Apr; 17(1):36. PubMed ID: 30953520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is antenatal care effective in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality?
McDonagh M
Health Policy Plan; 1996 Mar; 11(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 10155875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cost and cost-effectiveness of newborn home visits: findings from the Newhints cluster-randomised controlled trial in rural Ghana.
Pitt C; Tawiah T; Soremekun S; ten Asbroek AH; Manu A; Tawiah-Agyemang C; Hill Z; Owusu-Agyei S; Kirkwood BR; Hanson K
Lancet Glob Health; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e45-56. PubMed ID: 26639857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
