These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents. Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Katoh Y Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 8599594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns. Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material. Guzman AF; Moore BK; Andres CJ Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal integrity after fatigue loading of ceramic inlay restorations luted with three different cements. Abdalla AI; Davidson CL Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 11764831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Kawai K; Isenberg BP; Leinfelder KF Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 8190882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites. Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on wear resistance of luting agents. Shinkai K; Suzuki S; Leinfelder KF; Katoh Y Quintessence Int; 1994 Nov; 25(11):767-71. PubMed ID: 7568681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations. Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents. Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations. Braga RR; Condon JR; Ferracane JL J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 12542102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]