58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9807565)
1. Radiation dose reduction in CT: application to tissue area and volume determination.
Starck G; Lönn L; Cederblad A; Alpsten M; Sjöström L; Ekholm S
Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 9807565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method to obtain the same levels of CT image noise for patients of various sizes, to minimize radiation dose.
Starck G; Lönn L; Cederblad A; Forssell-Aronsson E; Sjöström L; Alpsten M
Br J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 75(890):140-50. PubMed ID: 11893638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survey of conventional and spiral ct doses.
Hidajat N; Wolf M; Nunnemann A; Liersch P; Gebauer B; Teichgräber U; Schröder RJ; Felix R
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 11161152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model.
Larson DB; Wang LL; Podberesky DJ; Goske MJ
Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 23784878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of simple radiation dose measurements in the evaluation of different CT scanners used for high-resolution CT.
Cassese JA; Brody AS; Thomas SR
J Thorac Imaging; 2003 Oct; 18(4):242-5. PubMed ID: 14561910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ICRU Report No. 87: Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography.
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements
J ICRU; 2012 Apr; 12(1):1-149. PubMed ID: 24158924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation dose reduction in chest CT--review of available options.
Kubo T; Ohno Y; Kauczor HU; Hatabu H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1953-61. PubMed ID: 25066756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accurate tissue area measurements with considerably reduced radiation dose achieved by patient-specific CT scan parameters.
Brandberg J; Lonn L; Bergelin E; Sjostrom L; Forssell-Aronsson E; Starck G
Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):801-8. PubMed ID: 18591200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose reduction during CT fluoroscopy: phantom study of angular beam modulation.
Hohl C; Suess C; Wildberger JE; Honnef D; Das M; Mühlenbruch G; Schaller A; Günther RW; Mahnken AH
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 18227544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simulated dose reduction by adding artificial noise to measured raw data: a validation study.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M; Nilsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):71-7. PubMed ID: 20172933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual energy versus single energy MDCT: measurement of radiation dose using adult abdominal imaging protocols.
Ho LM; Yoshizumi TT; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC; Marin D; Toncheva G; Schindera ST
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1400-7. PubMed ID: 19596594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of tube voltage on CT noise levels in different phantom sizes.
Karmazyn B; Liang Y; Klahr P; Jennings SG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1001-5. PubMed ID: 23617481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential for radiation dose savings in abdominal and chest CT using automatic tube voltage selection in combination with automatic tube current modulation.
Mayer C; Meyer M; Fink C; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Schoenberg SO; Henzler T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 25055262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated framework for digital radiation dose index reporting from CT dose reports.
Shih G; Lu ZF; Zabih R; Kennedy D; Loftus M; Shih WJ; Osborne J; Nickoloff E; Schwartz L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1170-4. PubMed ID: 22021511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
