BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9807880)

  • 1. [Audiometric threshold shift in patients with cochlear implantation].
    Capella Soriano B; Morera Pérez C; Cavallé Garrido L; Pérez Garrigues H
    An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1998; 25(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 9807880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of preservation of residual hearing using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation: can this implantation technique be used for preservation of residual hearing?
    Postelmans JT; van Spronsen E; Grolman W; Stokroos RJ; Tange RA; Maré MJ; Dreschler WA
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Aug; 121(8):1794-9. PubMed ID: 21792971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation.
    Di Nardo W; Cantore I; Cianfrone F; Melillo P; Rigante M; Paludetti G
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 17259703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.
    Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Driscoll CL; Blevins N; Francis H; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Otosclerosis: mid-term results of cochlear implantation.
    Sainz M; García-Valdecasas J; Garófano M; Ballesteros JM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 17675831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
    Vincenti V; Pasanisi E; Guida M; Di Trapani G; Sanna M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implantation outcomes in patients with autoimmune and immune-mediated inner ear disease.
    Aftab S; Semaan MT; Murray GS; Megerian CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1337-42. PubMed ID: 20729775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From hearing screening to cochlear implantation: cochlear implants in children under 3 years of age.
    Profant M; Kabátová Z; Simková L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 18368567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation.
    Balkany TJ; Connell SS; Hodges AV; Payne SL; Telischi FF; Eshraghi AA; Angeli SI; Germani R; Messiah S; Arheart KL
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Dec; 27(8):1083-8. PubMed ID: 17130798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Electrical testing of candidates for cochlear implantation].
    Petrov SM
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2003; (3):12-5. PubMed ID: 12847798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses.
    Guiraud J; Gallego S; Arnold L; Boyle P; Truy E; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):44-57. PubMed ID: 17350776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of potentially limiting factors on paediatric outcomes following cochlear implantation.
    Vlahović S; Sindija B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 68(9):1167-74. PubMed ID: 15302147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indications for and outcomes of mastoid obliteration in cochlear implantation.
    Leung R; Briggs RJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Apr; 28(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 17414038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implantation in infants less than 12 months of age.
    Valencia DM; Rimell FL; Friedman BJ; Oblander MR; Helmbrecht J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 72(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 18403026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T; Naito Y; Hirai T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.