These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9809328)

  • 21. Neonatal trials need thousands, not hundreds, to change global practice.
    Tarnow-Mordi W; Kumar P; Kler N
    Acta Paediatr; 2011 Mar; 100(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 21281339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.
    Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA; Stedman M; Avorn J; Solomon DH
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S38-43. PubMed ID: 17909381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Common errors in the design of orthopaedic studies.
    Bono CM; Tornetta P
    Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 16473355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Designing and funding clinical trials of novel therapies.
    Antman K; Lagakos S; Drazen J
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Mar; 344(10):762-3. PubMed ID: 11236782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Should minimization replace randomization in all clinical trials?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA; Idzerda L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22083018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials.
    Campbell MK; Thomson S; Ramsay CR; MacLennan GS; Grimshaw JM
    Comput Biol Med; 2004 Mar; 34(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 14972631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Independent design and conduct of clinical trials.
    Yusuf S; Bosch J
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(6):503-7. PubMed ID: 17170033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
    Lewsey JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Problems with up-front randomization in clinical trials.
    Wheatley K; Hills RK; Burnett AK
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(34):5471-2; author reply 5472-3. PubMed ID: 17135654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Design of randomized controlled trials.
    Stanley K
    Circulation; 2007 Mar; 115(9):1164-9. PubMed ID: 17339574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Study design VII. Randomised controlled trials.
    Levin KA
    Evid Based Dent; 2007; 8(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 17380181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding.
    Hróbjartsson A; Forfang E; Haahr MT; Als-Nielsen B; Brorson S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 36(3):654-63. PubMed ID: 17440024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
    Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
    J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early average change in tumor size in a phase 2 trial: efficient endpoint or false promise?
    Rubinstein LV; Dancey JE; Korn EL; Smith MA; Wright JJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1422-3. PubMed ID: 17895470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials.
    DeMets DL
    J Intern Med; 2004 May; 255(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 15078496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.
    Borm GF; Fransen J; Lemmens WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 17998077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Blinded sample size reestimation in non-inferiority trials with binary endpoints.
    Friede T; Mitchell C; Müller-Velten G
    Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):903-16. PubMed ID: 17726715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of clinical data with breached blindness.
    Chow SC; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1185-93. PubMed ID: 15083477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.