These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9809328)
41. Assessment of bias in methodology for randomized controlled trials published on implant dentistry. Dumbrigue HB; Al-Bayat MI; Ng CC; Wakefield CW J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16827739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. On the evolution of statistical methods as applied to clinical trials. Machin D J Intern Med; 2004 May; 255(5):521-8. PubMed ID: 15078495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Sequential designs for clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Groeneveld GJ; van der Tweel I; Wokke JH; van den Berg LH Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord; 2004 Dec; 5(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 15799547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Methodological aspects of biostatistics and epidemiology in a clinical trial]. Suárez E; Pérez CM P R Health Sci J; 1999 Mar; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10343983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Blinded sample size re-estimation in superiority and noninferiority trials: bias versus variance in variance estimation. Friede T; Kieser M Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23509095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design. Imai K Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4857-73. PubMed ID: 18618425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The merits of matching in community intervention trials: a cautionary tale. Klar N; Donner A Stat Med; 1997 Aug; 16(15):1753-64. PubMed ID: 9265698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Why caution is recommended with post-hoc individual patient matching for estimation of treatment effect in parallel-group randomized controlled trials: the case of acute stroke trials. Jafari N; Hearne J; Churilov L Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(25):4467-81. PubMed ID: 23761106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Attrition in substance abuse comparative treatment research: the illusion of randomization. Howard KI; Cox WM; Saunders SM NIDA Res Monogr; 1990; 104():66-79. PubMed ID: 2092226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Blinding in randomized controlled trials]. Simon EG; Arthuis CJ; Perrotin F Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Feb; 41(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 23375985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. On the usefulness of outcome-adaptive randomization. Yuan Y; Yin G J Clin Oncol; 2011 May; 29(13):e390-2; author reply e393. PubMed ID: 21422433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Consideration of medical research vs. scientific research. Pyle DE Med Hypotheses; 2005; 65(6):1199. PubMed ID: 16144744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Reply to correspondence on randomization in surgical studies. Grunkemeier GL; Starr A J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 8269134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The merits of matching in community intervention trials: a cautionary tale. Thompson SG Stat Med; 1998 Sep; 17(18):2149-52. PubMed ID: 9789921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]