These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9810056)

  • 1. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics.
    Casko JS; Vaden JL; Kokich VG; Damone J; James RD; Cangialosi TJ; Riolo ML; Owens SE; Bills ED
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Nov; 114(5):589-99. PubMed ID: 9810056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective cast and panoramic radiograph grading system.
    James RD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):450. PubMed ID: 12439470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Akinci Cansunar H; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 24785923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. University clinic and private practice treatment outcomes in Class I extraction and nonextraction patients: A comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
    Mislik B; Konstantonis D; Katsadouris A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 26827982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual application of the American Board of Orthodontics Grading System.
    Scott SA; Freer TJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16433082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
    Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthodontic treatment outcomes obtained by application of a finishing protocol.
    Carvajal-Flórez A; Barbosa-Lis DM; Zapata-Noreña OA; Marín-Velásquez JA; Afanador-Bayona SA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 27275620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of digital panoramic radiography in a newly established dental school.
    Kullman L; Joseph B
    Swed Dent J; 2006; 30(4):165-70. PubMed ID: 17243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices.
    Rushton VE; Horner K; Worthington HV
    Br Dent J; 1999 Jun; 186(12):630-3. PubMed ID: 10425808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Panoramic radiographs in dental diagnostics].
    van der Stelt PF
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2016 Apr; 123(4):181-7. PubMed ID: 27073808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to achieve a good panoramic exposure.
    Rupertus MA
    Dent Assist; 2014; 83(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 24741899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
    Hildebrand JC; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Sivik M; Hans M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 18249296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment outcome in a graduate orthodontic clinic using the American Board of Orthodontics grading system.
    Yang-Powers LC; Sadowsky C; Rosenstein S; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):451-5. PubMed ID: 12439471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of panoramic dental radiographs taken in private practice.
    Brezden NA; Brooks SL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 May; 63(5):617-21. PubMed ID: 3473384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Indication and frequency of X-rays in connection with orthodontic treatment. Statement by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kieferothopädie.
    J Orofac Orthop; 1997; 58(5):286-7. PubMed ID: 9342905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardization of diagnostic casts: description of technique.
    Schwartz R
    N Y J Dent; 1967 Nov; 37(9):327-36. PubMed ID: 4864343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reference dose levels for dental panoramic radiography in Gwangju, South Korea.
    Lee JS; Kim YH; Yoon SJ; Kang BC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):184-90. PubMed ID: 20702464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.