110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9810662)
1. Comparison of the E test and a proportion dilution method for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Fabry W; Schmid EN; Ansorg R
Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1995 Oct; 282(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 9810662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the E test and a proportion dilution method for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium kansasii.
Fabry W; Schmid EN; Ansorg R
Chemotherapy; 1995; 41(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 7555204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the E test and a proportion dilution method for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex.
Fabry W; Schmid EN; Ansorg R
J Med Microbiol; 1996 Mar; 44(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 8636943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Etest for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Joloba ML; Bajaksouzian S; Jacobs MR
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Oct; 38(10):3834-6. PubMed ID: 11015413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drug Susceptibility Profiling and Genetic Determinants of Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium kansasii.
Bakuła Z; Modrzejewska M; Pennings L; Proboszcz M; Safianowska A; Bielecki J; van Ingen J; Jagielski T
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2018 Apr; 62(4):. PubMed ID: 29437627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro activities of fourteen antimicrobial agents against drug susceptible and resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and comparative intracellular activities against the virulent H37Rv strain in human macrophages.
Rastogi N; Labrousse V; Goh KS
Curr Microbiol; 1996 Sep; 33(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 8672093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the E-test and proportion methods for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Sanic A; Gunaydin M; Coban AY; Tokac ; Cetin M
J Chemother; 2000 Dec; 12(6):491-4. PubMed ID: 11154031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MIC as a quantitative measurement of the susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium strains to seven antituberculosis drugs.
Heifets L
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1988 Aug; 32(8):1131-6. PubMed ID: 2461162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of in vitro synergy when three antimicrobial agents are combined against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Bhusal Y; Shiohira CM; Yamane N
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2005 Oct; 26(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 16150578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A rapid drug susceptibility test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using the hybridization protection assay.
Koga H; Miyamoto J; Ohno H; Ogawa K; Tomono K; Tashiro T; Kohno S
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1997 Aug; 40(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 9301983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Susceptibility of strains of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to fusidic acid.
Fuursted K; Askgaard D; Faber V
APMIS; 1992 Jul; 100(7):663-7. PubMed ID: 1642855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of amikacin and ciprofloxacin against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Satti M; Faqir F; Sattar A; Abbasi S; Butt T; Karamat KA; Abidi M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2010; 22(1):101-3. PubMed ID: 21409916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of three methods to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Muralidhar S; Srivastava L
Indian J Med Res; 2004 Nov; 120(5):463-7. PubMed ID: 15591630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of proportion method in Löwenstein-Jensen medium with the BACTEC 460 TB system for antimycobacterial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates].
Gül Yurtsever S; Biçmen C; Gündüz AT; Ozkütük N; Salman S; Demirci M
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Oct; 45(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 22090293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the broth microdilution method with 7H9 broth.
Coban AY; Birinci A; Ekinci B; Durupinar B
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz; 2004 Feb; 99(1):111-3. PubMed ID: 15057358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to fusidic acid.
Cicek-Saydam C; Cavusoglu C; Burhanoglu D; Hilmioglu S; Ozkalay N; Bilgic A
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2001 Dec; 7(12):700-2. PubMed ID: 11843915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in drug susceptibility pattern between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare isolated in respiratory specimens.
Cho EH; Huh HJ; Song DJ; Moon SM; Lee SH; Shin SY; Kim CK; Ki CS; Koh WJ; Lee NY
J Infect Chemother; 2018 Apr; 24(4):315-318. PubMed ID: 29223615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Etest for rapid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium chelonae and M. fortuitum.
Hoffner SE; Klintz L; Olsson-Liljequist B; Bolmström A
J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Aug; 32(8):1846-9. PubMed ID: 7989530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of standard proportion dilution test and Etest for Mycobacterium tuberculosis sensitivity to ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin].
Cavuşoğlu C; Ciçek-Saydam C; Burhanoğlu D; Ozkalay N; Ozkaya D; Ozçam H; Bilgiç A
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2002 Jan; 36(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 12476777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis by measuring mycobacterial adenosine triphosphate].
Yamazaki T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Okazawa Y; Miyao H; Tanno K
Rinsho Byori; 1999 Feb; 47(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 10097635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
