These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9811422)

  • 41. Combining extremely concordant sibpairs with extremely discordant sibpairs provides a cost effective way to linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci.
    Gu C; Todorov A; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(6):513-33. PubMed ID: 8968712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Advances in meta-analysis as a research method.
    Beard MT; Curry EL; Edwards K; Adams BN
    ABNF J; 1997; 8(5):92-7. PubMed ID: 9386389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pooling data and linkage analysis in the chromosome 5q candidate region for asthma.
    Jacobs KB; Burton PR; Iyengar SK; Elston RC; Palmer LJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S103-8. PubMed ID: 11793650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Extension of the Haseman-Elston regression model to longitudinal data.
    Won S; Elston RC; Park T
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 16733364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of meta-analysis versus analysis of variance of individual patient data.
    Olkin I; Sampson A
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):317-22. PubMed ID: 9544524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Meta-analysis for model-free methods.
    Gu C; Province MA; Rao DC
    Adv Genet; 2001; 42():255-72. PubMed ID: 11037326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Meta-analysis of genetic-linkage analysis of quantitative-trait loci.
    Etzel CJ; Guerra R
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Jul; 71(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 12037716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Efficiency robust tests for mapping quantitative trait loci using extremely discordant sib pairs.
    Freidlin B; Zheng G; Li Z; Gastwirth JL
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):117-24. PubMed ID: 12931050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The (non)comparability of the correlation effect size across different measurement procedures: a challenge to meta-analysis as a tool for identifying "evidence based practices".
    Nugent WR
    J Evid Based Soc Work; 2011 May; 8(3):253-74. PubMed ID: 21660822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Application of a Bayesian method for optimal subset regression to linkage analysis of Q1 and Q2.
    Suh YJ; Finch SJ; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S706-11. PubMed ID: 11793765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Two approaches of quantitative-trait linkage analysis].
    Su SY; Gu DF
    Yi Chuan; 2004 Mar; 26(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 15662739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sex of affected sibpairs and genetic linkage to type 1 diabetes.
    Paterson AD; Petronis A
    Am J Med Genet; 1999 May; 84(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 10213040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Genetic linkage analysis of a dichotomous trait incorporating a tightly linked quantitative trait in affected sib pairs.
    Huang J; Jiang Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Apr; 72(4):949-60. PubMed ID: 12644967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Construction of a confidence set of markers for the location of a disease gene using affected sib pair data.
    Lin S
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 12037409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rank transformation in Haseman-Elston regression using scores for location-scale alternatives.
    Gerhard D; Hothorn LA
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 20029226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A method for incorporating ages at onset in affected sibpair linkage studies.
    Hsu L; Li H; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Hum Hered; 2002; 54(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 12446982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The relative power of linkage and association studies for the detection of genes involved in hypertension.
    Jones HB
    Kidney Int; 1998 Jun; 53(6):1446-8. PubMed ID: 9607172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Haseman-Elston weighted by marker informativity.
    Franke D; Kleensang A; Elston RC; Ziegler A
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S50. PubMed ID: 16451662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Identifying genetic variation affecting a complex trait in simulated data: a comparison of meta-analysis with pooled data analysis.
    Wu X; Kan D; Cooper RS; Zhu X
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S97. PubMed ID: 16451713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Regression-based sib pair linkage analysis for binary traits.
    Zeegers MP; Rice JP; Rijsdijk FV; Abecasis GR; Sham PC
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):125-31. PubMed ID: 12931051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.