BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9811543)

  • 1. Chromatin conformation in living cells: support for a zig-zag model of the 30 nm chromatin fiber.
    Rydberg B; Holley WR; Mian IS; Chatterjee A
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Nov; 284(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 9811543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clusters of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation: formation of short DNA fragments. II. Experimental detection.
    Rydberg B
    Radiat Res; 1996 Feb; 145(2):200-9. PubMed ID: 8606930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clusters of DNA induced by ionizing radiation: formation of short DNA fragments. I. Theoretical modeling.
    Holley WR; Chatterjee A
    Radiat Res; 1996 Feb; 145(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 8606929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA DSB induced in human cells by charged particles and gamma rays: experimental results and theoretical approaches.
    Campa A; Ballarini F; Belli M; Cherubini R; Dini V; Esposito G; Friedland W; Gerardi S; Molinelli S; Ottolenghi A; Paretzke H; Simone G; Tabocchini MA
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2005 Nov; 81(11):841-54. PubMed ID: 16484153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo simulation of the production of short DNA fragments by low-linear energy transfer radiation using higher-order DNA models.
    Friedland W; Jacob P; Paretzke HG; Stork T
    Radiat Res; 1998 Aug; 150(2):170-82. PubMed ID: 9692362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chromatin loops are responsible for higher counts of small DNA fragments induced by high-LET radiation, while chromosomal domains do not affect the fragment sizes.
    Ponomarev AL; Cucinotta FA
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Apr; 82(4):293-305. PubMed ID: 16690597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Irradiation damage in chromatin isolated from V-79 Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts.
    Heussen C; Nackerdien Z; Smit BJ; Böhm L
    Radiat Res; 1987 Apr; 110(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 3562793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Condensed chromatin and cell inactivation by single-hit kinetics.
    Chapman JD; Stobbe CC; Gales T; Das IJ; Zellmer DL; Biade S; Matsumoto Y
    Radiat Res; 1999 Apr; 151(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 10190495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer evaluation of direct and indirect damage induced by free and DNA-bound iodine-125 in the chromatin fibre.
    Terrissol M; Edel S; Pomplun E
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2004; 80(11-12):905-8. PubMed ID: 15764400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of chromatin structure on induction of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells irradiated with DNA-incorporated 125I.
    Elmroth K; Stenerlöw B
    Radiat Res; 2007 Aug; 168(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 17638403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gamma radiation as a probe of chromatin structure: damage to and repair of active chromatin in the metaphase chromosome.
    Oleinick NL; Chiu SM; Friedman LR
    Radiat Res; 1984 Jun; 98(3):629-41. PubMed ID: 6729055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of DNA/chromatin organisation and scavenging capacity in USX- and proton- induced DNA damage.
    Alloni D; Ballarini F; Friedland W; Liotta M; Molinelli S; Ottolenghi A; Paretzke HG; Rossetti M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):141-6. PubMed ID: 17284477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromatin- and temperature-dependent modulation of radiation-induced double-strand breaks.
    Elmroth K; Nygren J; Stenerlöw B; Hultborn R
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2003 Oct; 79(10):809-16. PubMed ID: 14630540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulling chromatin fibers: computer simulations of direct physical micromanipulations.
    Katritch V; Bustamante C; Olson WK
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jan; 295(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 10623506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of radiation induced DNA double-strand breaks in human fibroblasts by PFGE: testing the applicability of random breakage models.
    Pinto M; Prise KM; Michael BD
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 May; 78(5):375-88. PubMed ID: 12020428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In silico approaches reveal the potential for DNA sequence-dependent histone octamer affinity to influence chromatin structure in vivo.
    Fraser RM; Allan J; Simmen MW
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Dec; 364(4):582-98. PubMed ID: 17027853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA-repair protein distribution along the tracks of energetic ions.
    Hauptner A; Krücken R; Greubel C; Hable V; Dollinger G; Drexler GA; Deutsch M; Löwe R; Friedl AA; Dietzel S; Strickfaden H; Cremer T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):147-9. PubMed ID: 17132661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation of light ion induced DNA damage patterns.
    Friedland W; Jacob P; Paretzke HG; Ottolenghi A; Ballarini F; Liotta M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):116-20. PubMed ID: 17166872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of single-stranded breaks on the ultrastructural organization and cytochemistry of the chromatin in tumor cells].
    Erenpreĭsa EA; Zirne RA; Zaleskaia ND; S'iakste TG
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1988 Nov; 106(11):591-3. PubMed ID: 2461749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. X-ray structure of a tetranucleosome and its implications for the chromatin fibre.
    Schalch T; Duda S; Sargent DF; Richmond TJ
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):138-41. PubMed ID: 16001076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.