120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9812231)
21. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW
JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: A cytohistological study in a colposcopy clinic.
Ettler HC; Joseph MG; Downing PA; Suskin NG; Wright VC
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Sep; 21(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 10450110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Simulation of primary cervical cancer screening by the PAPNET system in an unscreened, high-risk community.
Michelow PM; Hlongwane NF; Leiman G
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 9022732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The PAPNET system for quality control of cervical smears: validation and limits.
Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(6D):4731-4. PubMed ID: 9494597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ASCUS: comparative follow-up results related to previous SIL diagnosis.
Alameda F; Fuste P; Conangla M; Gimferrer E; Soler I; Antorn MT; Persico S; Carreras R; Serrano S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 10726627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. PAPNET analysis of reportedly negative smears preceding the diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma.
Sherman ME; Mango LJ; Kelly D; Paull G; Ludin V; Copeland C; Solomon D; Schiffman MH
Mod Pathol; 1994 Jun; 7(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 7937724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
Rosenthal DL; Acosta D; Peters RK
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Significance of extensive hyperkeratosis on cervical/vaginal smears.
Williamson BA; DeFrias D; Gunn R; Tarjan G; Nayar R
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(5):749-52. PubMed ID: 14526673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The ASCUS : SIL ratio and the reference laboratory pathologist.
Wachtel MS; Dahm PF
Cytopathology; 2003 Oct; 14(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 14510888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rare atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): a clinically significant diagnosis?
Hoerl HD; Roth-Cline MD; Shalkham JE; Pfister J; Stewart J; Guo Z; De Las Casas LE; Caya JG; Kurtycz DF
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jul; 27(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 12112807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Educational needs and causes of false diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance at a university hospital.
Kumar N; Sayed S; Moloo Z
Afr J Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 15(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 21987946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Current laboratory practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory. Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Davey DD; Nielsen ML; Naryshkin S; Robb JA; Cohen T; Kline TS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 May; 120(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8639046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Papnet-assisted, primary screening of cervico-vaginal smears.
Duggan MA
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10726616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Consistency of a double PAPNET scan of cervical smears.
Jenny J; Isenegger I; Boon ME; Husain OA
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 9022731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Keating JT; Wang HH
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11309774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
