130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9812793)
1. The correction of Class II, division 1 malocclusion with bionator headgear combination appliance.
Mao J; Zhao H
J Tongji Med Univ; 1997; 17(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 9812793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II: a comparison of activator and activator headgear combination appliances.
Oztürk Y; Tankuter N
Eur J Orthod; 1994 Apr; 16(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 8005202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative assessment of two-phase class II treatment with Activator or Bionator followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective controlled before-and-after study.
Abbing A; Koretsi V; Kalavritinos M; Schröder T; Eliades T; Papageorgiou SN
Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100863. PubMed ID: 38428369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphometric analysis of long-term dentoskeletal effects induced by treatment with Balters bionator.
Bigliazzi R; Franchi L; Bertoz AP; McNamara JA; Faltin K; Bertoz FA
Angle Orthod; 2015 Sep; 85(5):790-8. PubMed ID: 25469744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
Bilbo EE; Marshall SD; Southard KA; Allareddy V; Holton N; Thames AM; Otsby MS; Southard TE
Angle Orthod; 2018 Sep; 88(5):530-537. PubMed ID: 29667470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment effects of headgear biteplane and bionator appliances.
Almeida-Pedrin RR; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Ferreira FP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17693369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of combination second molar extraction and functional appliance therapy.
Whitney EF; Sinclair PM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Mar; 91(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 3469904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular growth and dentoalveolar development in the treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusion using Balters Bionator according to the skeletal maturation.
dos Santos-Pinto PR; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A; Gandini Júnior LG; Raveli DB; dos Santos-Pinto CC
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(4):43-52. PubMed ID: 24262416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of the Balters bionator in growing Class II patients.
Antunes CF; Bigliazzi R; Bertoz FA; Ortolani CL; Franchi L; Faltin K
Angle Orthod; 2013 May; 83(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 23137316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research efficacy trials of bionator class II treatment: a review.
Jacobs T; Sawaengkit P
Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):571-5. PubMed ID: 12518950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
