164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9814513)
1. Comparison of two methods of therapy level calibration at 60Co gamma beams.
Bjerke H; Järvinen H; Grimbergen TW; Grindborg JE; Chauvenet B; Czap L; Ennow K; Moretti C; Rocha P
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):2729-40. PubMed ID: 9814513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The US radiation dosimetry standards for 60Co therapy level beams, and the transfer to the AAPM accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories.
Minniti R; Chen-Mayer H; Seltzer SM; Huq MS; Bryson L; Slowey T; Micka JA; DeWerd LA; Wells N; Hanson WF; Ibbott GS;
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1074-7. PubMed ID: 16696484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of Australian and Canadian calibration coefficients for air kerma and absorbed dose to water for 60Co gamma radiation.
Shortt KR; Huntley RB; Kotler LH; Boas JF; Webb DV
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Jun; 29(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16845927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shift in absorbed dose for megavoltage photons when changing to TRS-398 in Australia.
Butler DJ; Palmans H; Webb DV; ;
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 16250469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Development of the 60Co gamma-ray standard field for therapy-level dosimeter calibration in terms of absorbed dose to water (N(D,w))].
Fukumura A; Mizuno H; Fukahori M; Sakata S
Igaku Butsuri; 2012; 32(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 24568023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Kwok CB
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Air kerma based dosimetry calibration for the Leksell Gamma Knife.
Meltsner SG; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):339-50. PubMed ID: 19291973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25.
Gerbi BJ; Antolak JA; Deibel FC; Followill DS; Herman MG; Higgins PD; Huq MS; Mihailidis DN; Yorke ED; Hogstrom KR; Khan FM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3239-79. PubMed ID: 19673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo and
Lawless MJ; Dimaso L; Palmer B; Micka J; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5564-5576. PubMed ID: 30273996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dosimetry calibration factors at the NRCC and the NIST. National Research Council of Canada. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Shortt K; Shobe J; Domen S
Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1644-54. PubMed ID: 10947268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinic based transfer of the N(D,W)(60Co) calibration coefficient using a linear accelerator.
Abdel-Rahman W; Evans MD; Serré L; McCaffrey JP; Podgorsak EB; Seuntjens JP
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):929-38. PubMed ID: 19378753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental derivation of wall correction factors for ionization chambers used in high dose rate 192Ir source calibration.
Maréchal MH; de Almeida CE; Ferreira IH; Sibata CH
Med Phys; 2002 Jan; 29(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11833542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
