222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9814807)
1. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.
Frazier BL; Derrick MJ; Purewal SS; Sowka LR; Johna S
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S122-5. PubMed ID: 9814807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via hemi-sternotomy: a preliminary report.
Tam RK; Almeida AA
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S134-7. PubMed ID: 9814810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the femoral cannulation for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement necessary?
Cuenca J; Rodriguez-Delgadillo MA; Valle JV; Campos V; Herrera JM; Rodriguez F; Portela F; Sorribas F; Juffe A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S111-4. PubMed ID: 9814804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. S-shaped in comparison to L-shaped partial sternotomy for less invasive aortic valve replacement.
Autschbach R; Walther T; Falk V; Diegeler A; Metz S; Mohr FW
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S117-21. PubMed ID: 9814806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a transverse sternotomy: a word of caution.
Bridgewater B; Steyn RS; Ray S; Hooper T
Heart; 1998 Jun; 79(6):605-7. PubMed ID: 10078090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes.
Ariyaratnam P; Loubani M; Griffin SC
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Sep; 23(7):814-21. PubMed ID: 25991010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.
Gilmanov D; Bevilacqua S; Murzi M; Cerillo AG; Gasbarri T; Kallushi E; Miceli A; Glauber M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 23866805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical results of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy: comparison with median sternotomy.
Masiello P; Coscioni E; Panza A; Triumbari F; Preziosi G; Di Benedetto G
Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Aug; 10(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 12359403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without sternotomy. Experience with the first 50 cases.
Minale C; Reifschneider HJ; Schmitz E; Uckmann FP
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct; 14 Suppl 1():S126-9. PubMed ID: 9814808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should minimally invasive aortic valve replacement be restricted to primary interventions?
Bakir I; Casselman FP; De Geest R; Wellens F; Degrieck I; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Vanermen H
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 55(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 17629860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.
Liu J; Sidiropoulos A; Konertz W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10613563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic and mitral valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach.
Klokocovnik T
Tex Heart Inst J; 1998; 25(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 9782554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.
Gilmanov D; Farneti PA; Ferrarini M; Santarelli F; Murzi M; Miceli A; Solinas M; Glauber M
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):732-41; discussion 741. PubMed ID: 25757476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery.
Byrne JG; Karavas AN; Adams DH; Aklog L; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Rizzo RJ; Cohn LH
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2000 Sep; 18(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 10973536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of Minimally Invasive Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Liang NE; Wisneski AD; Wozniak CJ; Ge L; Tseng EE
Innovations (Phila); 2019 Jun; 14(3):251-262. PubMed ID: 31081708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally-invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement--perioperative course and mid-term results.
Christiansen S; Stypmann J; Tjan TD; Wichter T; Van Aken H; Scheld HH; Hammel D
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Dec; 16(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 10647835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients.
Bakir I; Casselman FP; Wellens F; Jeanmart H; De Geest R; Degrieck I; Van Praet F; Vermeulen Y; Vanermen H
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 May; 81(5):1599-604. PubMed ID: 16631641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sutureless Valve Implantation via Mini J-Sternotomy: A Single Center Experience with 2 Years Mean Follow-up.
Fischlein T; Pfeiffer S; Pollari F; Sirch J; Vogt F; Santarpino G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 26177222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility and clinical outcome after minimally invasive valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Wachter K; Franke UF; Yadav R; Nagib R; Ursulescu A; Ahad S; Baumbach H
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28040763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimal vs median sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.
Moustafa MA; Abdelsamad AA; Zakaria G; Omarah MM
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2007 Dec; 15(6):472-5. PubMed ID: 18042770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
