146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9814888)
1. Estimation of the dominance variance for postweaning gain in the U.S. Limousin population.
Gengler N; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Culbertson MS
J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2515-20. PubMed ID: 9814888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of dominance relationships on the estimation of dominance variance with sire-dam subclass effects.
Gengler N; Van Vleck LD; MacNeil MD; Misztal I; Pariacote FA
J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2885-91. PubMed ID: 9374300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Additive, dominance, and epistatic loss effects on preweaning weight gain of crossbred beef cattle from different Bos taurus breeds.
Roso VM; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Wilton JW
J Anim Sci; 2005 Aug; 83(8):1780-7. PubMed ID: 16024696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic variance and covariance and breed differences for feed intake and average daily gain to improve feed efficiency in growing cattle.
Retallick KJ; Bormann JM; Weaber RL; MacNeil MD; Bradford HL; Freetly HC; Hales KE; Moser DW; Snelling WM; Thallman RM; Kuehn LA
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1444-1450. PubMed ID: 28464090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of accounting for different phenotypic variances by sire breed and sex on selection of sires based on expected progeny differences for 200- and 365-day weights.
Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2589-99. PubMed ID: 8582848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variance components and breeding values for growth traits from different statistical models.
Ferreira GB; MacNeil MD; Van Vleck LD
J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2641-50. PubMed ID: 10521023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of non-additive genetic variances in three synthetic lines of beef cattle using an animal model.
Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Willham RL; Northcutt SL
J Anim Sci; 1995 Apr; 73(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 7628942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breed effects and heterosis in advanced generations of composite populations for growth traits in both sexes of beef cattle.
Gregory KE; Cundiff LV; Koch RM
J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3202-12. PubMed ID: 1894555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Heterogeneity of variance by sire breed, sex, and dam breed in 200- and 365-day weights of beef cattle from a top cross experiment.
Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Kachman SD
J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2579-88. PubMed ID: 8582847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing methodologies to estimate fixed genetic effects and to predict genetic values for an Angus × Nellore cattle population.
Bertoli CD; Braccini J; Roso VM
J Anim Sci; 2016 Feb; 94(2):500-13. PubMed ID: 27065120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimates of genetic and environmental effects on performance traits from limousin field data.
Massey ME; Benyshek LL
J Anim Sci; 1981 Jan; 52(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7240037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing genetic evaluations of linebred Hereford cattle in diverse environments.
Snelling WM; MacNeil MD; Kress DD; Anderson DC; Tess MW
J Anim Sci; 1996 Jul; 74(7):1499-510. PubMed ID: 8818794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Additive and nonadditive genetic variability for growth traits in the Turipaná Romosinuano-Zebu multibreed herd.
Elzo MA; Manrique C; Ossa G; Acosta O
J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 9655573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle.
Snelling WM; Allan MF; Keele JW; Kuehn LA; McDaneld T; Smith TP; Sonstegard TS; Thallman RM; Bennett GL
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):837-48. PubMed ID: 19966163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of cytoplasmic genetic effects in Miles City Line 1 Hereford cattle.
Tess MW; MacNeil MD
J Anim Sci; 1994 Apr; 72(4):851-6. PubMed ID: 8014149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances in Hereford, Gelbvieh, and Charolais by Method R.
Duangjinda M; Bertrand JK; Misztal I; Druet T
J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2997-3001. PubMed ID: 11811452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of genotype x country interactions for growth traits in beef cattle.
Lee DH; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2002 Feb; 80(2):330-7. PubMed ID: 11881922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simulated influence of postweaning production system on performance of different biological types of cattle: I. Estimation of model parameters.
Williams CB; Bennett GL; Keele JW
J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):665-73. PubMed ID: 7607999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine.
Culbertson MS; Mabry JW; Misztal I; Gengler N; Bertrand JK; Varona L
J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 9498351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of direct and maternal breed effects for prediction of expected progeny differences for birth and weaning weights in three multibreed populations.
Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Gregory KE
J Anim Sci; 1997 May; 75(5):1203-12. PubMed ID: 9159266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
