These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9814888)

  • 1. Estimation of the dominance variance for postweaning gain in the U.S. Limousin population.
    Gengler N; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Culbertson MS
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2515-20. PubMed ID: 9814888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of dominance relationships on the estimation of dominance variance with sire-dam subclass effects.
    Gengler N; Van Vleck LD; MacNeil MD; Misztal I; Pariacote FA
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2885-91. PubMed ID: 9374300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additive, dominance, and epistatic loss effects on preweaning weight gain of crossbred beef cattle from different Bos taurus breeds.
    Roso VM; Schenkel FS; Miller SP; Wilton JW
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Aug; 83(8):1780-7. PubMed ID: 16024696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic variance and covariance and breed differences for feed intake and average daily gain to improve feed efficiency in growing cattle.
    Retallick KJ; Bormann JM; Weaber RL; MacNeil MD; Bradford HL; Freetly HC; Hales KE; Moser DW; Snelling WM; Thallman RM; Kuehn LA
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1444-1450. PubMed ID: 28464090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of accounting for different phenotypic variances by sire breed and sex on selection of sires based on expected progeny differences for 200- and 365-day weights.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2589-99. PubMed ID: 8582848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variance components and breeding values for growth traits from different statistical models.
    Ferreira GB; MacNeil MD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2641-50. PubMed ID: 10521023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of non-additive genetic variances in three synthetic lines of beef cattle using an animal model.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Willham RL; Northcutt SL
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Apr; 73(4):1002-11. PubMed ID: 7628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breed effects and heterosis in advanced generations of composite populations for growth traits in both sexes of beef cattle.
    Gregory KE; Cundiff LV; Koch RM
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3202-12. PubMed ID: 1894555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heterogeneity of variance by sire breed, sex, and dam breed in 200- and 365-day weights of beef cattle from a top cross experiment.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Kachman SD
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2579-88. PubMed ID: 8582847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing methodologies to estimate fixed genetic effects and to predict genetic values for an Angus × Nellore cattle population.
    Bertoli CD; Braccini J; Roso VM
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Feb; 94(2):500-13. PubMed ID: 27065120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimates of genetic and environmental effects on performance traits from limousin field data.
    Massey ME; Benyshek LL
    J Anim Sci; 1981 Jan; 52(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7240037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing genetic evaluations of linebred Hereford cattle in diverse environments.
    Snelling WM; MacNeil MD; Kress DD; Anderson DC; Tess MW
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Jul; 74(7):1499-510. PubMed ID: 8818794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Additive and nonadditive genetic variability for growth traits in the Turipaná Romosinuano-Zebu multibreed herd.
    Elzo MA; Manrique C; Ossa G; Acosta O
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 9655573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-wide association study of growth in crossbred beef cattle.
    Snelling WM; Allan MF; Keele JW; Kuehn LA; McDaneld T; Smith TP; Sonstegard TS; Thallman RM; Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):837-48. PubMed ID: 19966163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of cytoplasmic genetic effects in Miles City Line 1 Hereford cattle.
    Tess MW; MacNeil MD
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Apr; 72(4):851-6. PubMed ID: 8014149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances in Hereford, Gelbvieh, and Charolais by Method R.
    Duangjinda M; Bertrand JK; Misztal I; Druet T
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2997-3001. PubMed ID: 11811452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of genotype x country interactions for growth traits in beef cattle.
    Lee DH; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Feb; 80(2):330-7. PubMed ID: 11881922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulated influence of postweaning production system on performance of different biological types of cattle: I. Estimation of model parameters.
    Williams CB; Bennett GL; Keele JW
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):665-73. PubMed ID: 7607999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine.
    Culbertson MS; Mabry JW; Misztal I; Gengler N; Bertrand JK; Varona L
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 9498351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of direct and maternal breed effects for prediction of expected progeny differences for birth and weaning weights in three multibreed populations.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Gregory KE
    J Anim Sci; 1997 May; 75(5):1203-12. PubMed ID: 9159266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.