158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9814904)
1. Coupling of image analysis and tenderness classification to simultaneously evaluate carcass cutability, longissimus area, subprimal cut weights, and tenderness of beef.
Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 1998 Oct; 76(10):2631-40. PubMed ID: 9814904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data.
Tait RG; Wilson DE; Rouse GH
J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 15890812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of live and carcass equations predicting percentage of cutability, retail product weight, and trimmable fat in beef cattle.
Herring WO; Williams SE; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Miller DC
J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1107-18. PubMed ID: 8056655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses.
Realini CE; Williams RE; Pringle TD; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2001 Jun; 79(6):1378-85. PubMed ID: 11424672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of body condition score on carcass characteristics and subprimal yield from cull beef cows.
Apple JK; Davis JC; Stephenson J; Hankins JE; Davis JR; Beaty SL
J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2660-9. PubMed ID: 10521025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Online evaluation of a commercial video image analysis system (Computer Vision System) to predict beef carcass red meat yield and for augmenting the assignment of USDA yield grades. United States Department of Agriculture.
Cannell RC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Chapman PL; Scanga JA; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2002 May; 80(5):1195-201. PubMed ID: 12019606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-component video image analysis system (VIASCAN) as a predictor of beef carcass red meat yield percentage and for augmenting application of USDA yield grades.
Cannell RC; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Wise JW; Clayton RP; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 1999 Nov; 77(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 10568462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting beef carcass cutability.
Shackelford SD; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 1995 Feb; 73(2):406-13. PubMed ID: 7601772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Video image analysis as a potential grading system for Uruguayan beef carcasses.
Vote DJ; Bowling MB; Cunha BC; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Montossi F; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2376-90. PubMed ID: 19395512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of dietary ractopamine hydrochloride and zilpaterol hydrochloride supplementation on performance, carcass traits, and carcass cutability in beef steers.
Arp TS; Howard ST; Woerner DR; Scanga JA; McKenna DR; Kolath WH; Chapman PL; Tatum JD; Belk KE
J Anim Sci; 2014 Feb; 92(2):836-43. PubMed ID: 24664571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On-line prediction of yield grade, longissimus muscle area, preliminary yield grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, and marbling score using the MARC beef carcass image analysis system.
Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M
J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 12597385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining beef carcass retail product and fat yields within 1 hour postmortem.
Apple JK; Dikeman ME; Cundiff LV; Wise JW
J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4845-57. PubMed ID: 1808179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Yield grades and cutability of carcass beef with and without kidney and pelvic fat.
Crouse JD; Koch RM; Dikeman ME
J Anim Sci; 1986 Oct; 63(4):1134-9. PubMed ID: 3771396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Online prediction of beef tenderness using a computer vision system equipped with a BeefCam module.
Vote DJ; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Scanga JA; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2003 Feb; 81(2):457-65. PubMed ID: 12643490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride on carcass cutability and tenderness of calf-fed Holstein steers.
Garmyn AJ; Shook JN; VanOverbeke DL; Beckett JL; Delmore RJ; Yates DA; Allen DM; Hilton GG
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2476-85. PubMed ID: 20382878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle.
Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
J Anim Sci; 2003 Jul; 81(7):1736-42. PubMed ID: 12854810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimates of beef carcass intermuscular fat.
Kent KR; Davis GW; Ramsey CB; Schluter AR
J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4836-44. PubMed ID: 1808178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical note: the United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation requires modification to reflect the current longissimus muscle area to hot carcass weight relationship.
Lawrence TE; Farrow RL; Zollinger BL; Spivey KS
J Anim Sci; 2008 Jun; 86(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 18310492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride on retail yields of subprimals from beef and calf-fed Holstein steers.
Haneklaus AN; Hodgen JM; Delmore RJ; Lawrence TE; Yates DA; Allen DM; Griffin DB; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(9):2867-77. PubMed ID: 21478448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the point of separation, during carcass fabrication, between the beef wholesale rib and the beef wholesale chuck.
Reuter BJ; Wulf DM; Shanks BC; Maddock RJ
J Anim Sci; 2002 Jan; 80(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 11831505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
