These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9814923)
41. Biomechanical Comparison of Volar Fixed-Angle Locking Plates for AO C3 Distal Radius Fractures: Titanium Versus Stainless Steel With Compression. Marshall T; Momaya A; Eberhardt A; Chaudhari N; Hunt TR J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Oct; 40(10):2032-8. PubMed ID: 26253601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Biomechanical comparison of screw-based zones of a spatial subchondral support plate for proximal humerus fractures. Jabran A; Peach C; Zou Z; Ren L Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Mar; 233(3):372-382. PubMed ID: 30700217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Humeral blade plate fixation of intercalary allografts and segmentally comminuted proximal humeral fractures: a preliminary report. Rehman S; Damron TA; Geel C Injury; 2000 Dec; 31(10):783-8. PubMed ID: 11154748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparative biomechanical analysis of implants for the stabilization of proximal humerus fractures. Füchtmeier B; May R; Fierlbeck J; Hammer J; Nerlich M Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):261-70. PubMed ID: 17065749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Influence of plate material and screw design on stiffness and ultimate load of locked plating in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures. Katthagen JC; Schwarze M; Warnhoff M; Voigt C; Hurschler C; Lill H Injury; 2016 Mar; 47(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 26804939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model. Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The role of medial comminution and calcar restoration in varus collapse of proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plates. Ponce BA; Thompson KJ; Raghava P; Eberhardt AW; Tate JP; Volgas DA; Stannard JP J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Aug; 95(16):e113(1-7). PubMed ID: 23965707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A biomechanical evaluation of two fixation techniques. Edwards SL; Wilson NA; Zhang LQ; Flores S; Merk BR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Oct; 88(10):2258-64. PubMed ID: 17015605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of fibular plate fixation on rotational stability of simulated distal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. Kumar A; Charlebois SJ; Cain EL; Smith RA; Daniels AU; Crates JM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Apr; 85(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 12672833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate. Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Biomechanical comparison of screw-based zoning of PHILOS and Fx proximal humerus plates. Jabran A; Peach C; Zou Z; Ren L BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jul; 19(1):253. PubMed ID: 30045716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus: a laboratory evaluation of ten fixation techniques. Koval KJ; Blair B; Takei R; Kummer FJ; Zuckerman JD J Trauma; 1996 May; 40(5):778-83. PubMed ID: 8614080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Plath JE; Kerschbaum C; Seebauer T; Holz R; Henderson DJH; Förch S; Mayr E BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 30630465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Anatomical and biomechanical evaluation of an intramedullary nail for fractures of proximal humerus fractures based on tuberosity fixation. Clavert P; Hatzidakis A; Boileau P Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():108-12. PubMed ID: 26743868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Fixed-angle plate fixation in simulated fractures of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical study of a new device. Chudik SC; Weinhold P; Dahners LE J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2003; 12(6):578-88. PubMed ID: 14671522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mechanisms of failure of locked-plate fixation of the proximal humerus: acoustic emissions as a novel assessment modality. Hymes RA; Levine MJ; Schulman JE; Westbrook RD; Li J J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jul; 27(7):392-8. PubMed ID: 23187155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Biomechanical in vitro assessment of screw augmentation in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. Röderer G; Scola A; Schmölz W; Gebhard F; Windolf M; Hofmann-Fliri L Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1327-32. PubMed ID: 23769470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected]. Owsley KC; Gorczyca JT J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Feb; 90(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 18245580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Internal fixation of radial neck fractures: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Giffin JR; King GJ; Patterson SD; Johnson JA Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):358-61. PubMed ID: 15109755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]