59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9816620)
1. [Comparison of a high-end ultrasound system with a spiral CT scanner in screening for liver metastases].
Seemann MD; Bonél H; Wintersperger B; Herrmann K; Sittek H; Reiser MF
Ultraschall Med; 1998 Aug; 19(4):164-7. PubMed ID: 9816620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions - prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreiländertreffen 2008, Davos.
Seitz K; Strobel D; Bernatik T; Blank W; Friedrich-Rust M; Herbay Av; Dietrich CF; Strunk H; Kratzer W; Schuler A
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Aug; 30(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 19688670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of malignant liver tumors: biphasic MS-CT versus quantitative contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound.
Clevert DA; Jung EM; Stock KF; Weckbach S; Feuerbach S; Reiser M; Jung F
Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):1195-202. PubMed ID: 19960397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Value of ultrasound in screening for liver metastases and liver involvement in malignant systemic disease].
Vatter J; Brecht G; Franken T; Harder T
Rofo; 1984 Feb; 140(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 6420283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Spiral CT features of hepatocellular caicinoma].
Qiao Y; Yan F; Wu J
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 22(2):164-5. PubMed ID: 11776650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of neuroendocrine liver metastases with MnDPDP-enhanced MRI.
Rockall AG; Planche K; Power N; Nowosinska E; Monson JP; Grossman AB; Reznek RH
Neuroendocrinology; 2009; 89(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19023191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Localisation of focal liver lesions to specific hepatic segments--comparison of multiphase spiral CT and MR imaging.
Bobek-Billewicz B; Szurowska E; Zapaśnik A; Izycka-Swieszewska E; Gorycki T; Nowakowski M
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2002; 61(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12725499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of liver metastases from endocrine tumors: a prospective comparison of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.
Dromain C; de Baere T; Lumbroso J; Caillet H; Laplanche A; Boige V; Ducreux M; Duvillard P; Elias D; Schlumberger M; Sigal R; Baudin E
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 15625361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Liver metastasis from carcinoid: diagnostic imaging].
De Santis M; Santini D; Alborino S; Carubbi F; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 1996 Nov; 92(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 9036451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liver lesion detection and characterization in patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of low radiation dose non-enhanced PET/CT, contrast-enhanced PET/CT, and liver MRI.
Cantwell CP; Setty BN; Holalkere N; Sahani DV; Fischman AJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 18830103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of multiphase CT, FDG-PET and intra-operative ultrasound in patients with colorectal liver metastases selected for surgery.
Wiering B; Ruers TJ; Krabbe PF; Dekker HM; Oyen WJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):818-26. PubMed ID: 17136470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal liver metastases for liver resection.
Bhattacharjya S; Bhattacharjya T; Baber S; Tibballs JM; Watkinson AF; Davidson BR
Br J Surg; 2004 Oct; 91(10):1361-9. PubMed ID: 15376205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic ultrasound versus CT scan for detection of the metastases to the liver: results of a prospective comparative study.
Singh P; Mukhopadhyay P; Bhatt B; Patel T; Kiss A; Gupta R; Bhat S; Erickson RA
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 43(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 18981929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Focal liver diseases. Comparative study of computed tomography, conventional ultrasound and the automated multisector scanner (Octoson)].
Fiegler W; Schütz H; Claussen C; Schörner W; Felix R
Rofo; 1984 Jul; 141(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 6431525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ultrasound diagnosis in a comparison of imaging methods].
Seitz K
Ultraschall Med; 1998 Aug; 19(4):147. PubMed ID: 9816617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic value of sonography and computed tomography in liver metastases].
Zocholl G; Kuhn FP; Augustin N; Thelen M
Rofo; 1988 Jan; 148(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 2829314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonography of liver haemangioma. A report of 35 patients totalizing 53 lesions.
Marchal G; Baert AL; Fevery J; Kint E; Peeters S; van Dijck X; de Maeyer P; Usewils R; Wilms G
Rofo; 1983 Feb; 138(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 6219055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Secondary liver lesions studied with double-helix spiral computed tomography: first experience].
Vannucchi L; Zanfranceschi G; Simonelli P; Niccolai F; Piperno G
Radiol Med; 1996 Jun; 91(6):769-73. PubMed ID: 8830364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Detection of liver metastases--comparison of contrast--enhanced ultrasound using first versus second generation contrast agents].
Bernatik T; Becker D; Neureiter D; Hänsler J; Frieser M; Schaber S; Hahn EG; Strobel D
Ultraschall Med; 2003 Jun; 24(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 12817311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A comparison of the visualization of liver metastases using sonography and dynamic computed tomography].
Kumm M; Langer M; Langer R; Zwicker C; Treisch J; Banzer D
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jul; 1(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 1911893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
