These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9816642)

  • 1. [Computer-assisted diagnosis in mammography: the R2 ImageChecker System in detection of spiculated lesions].
    Funovics M; Schamp S; Lackner B; Wunderbaldinger P; Lechner G; Wolf G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1998; 148(14):321-4. PubMed ID: 9816642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma].
    Funovics M; Schamp S; Helbich TH; Lackner B; Wunderbaldinger P; Fuchsjäger M; Lechner G; Wolf G
    Rofo; 2001 Mar; 173(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 11293863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Computer-assisted evaluation of mammography images. Initial clinical experiences].
    Sittek H; Herrmann K; Perlet C; Künzer I; Kessler M; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):610-6. PubMed ID: 9411477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of the primary diagnosis with a CAD-system in mammography].
    Malich A; Vogel D; Facius M; Marx C; Freesmeyer MG; Sauner D; Hansch A; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 12964078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast carcinoma].
    Ding JH; Peng WJ; Jiang ZX; Xu LH; Hu DT; Zheng XJ
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 31(11):854-7. PubMed ID: 20137352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer: importance of spiculation in computer-aided detection.
    Vyborny CJ; Doi T; O'Shaughnessy KF; Romsdahl HM; Schneider AC; Stein AA
    Radiology; 2000 Jun; 215(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 10831688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology.
    Brem RF; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Hoffmeister JW; Desimio MP
    Cancer; 2005 Sep; 104(5):931-5. PubMed ID: 16047331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Kim SY; Chang JM; Kim SM; Cho N
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20429765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system.
    Malich A; Marx C; Facius M; Boehm T; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(12):2454-9. PubMed ID: 11734939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion.
    Baker JA; Rosen EL; Lo JY; Gimenez EI; Walsh R; Soo MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):1083-8. PubMed ID: 14500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted detection as a second reader in symptomatic Asian women with palpable breast cancer.
    Chu WC; Lam WW; Pang AL; So NM; Tang AP; Tse GM; Ahuja AT
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 15191097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening mammography interpretation test: more frequent mistakes.
    Gozzi G; Martinoli C; Conti GM; Ganzetti A; Bodini M; Fiorentino C; Marini UP; Santini D; Bacigalupo L
    Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 15775896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study.
    Brem RF; Schoonjans JM
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Feb; 56(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 11222075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.
    Kegelmeyer WP; Pruneda JM; Bourland PD; Hillis A; Riggs MW; Nipper ML
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 8153302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Value of CAD systems].
    Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 12063734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Morphometry by analysis of microcalcifications and histopathological diagnosis: a new approach to the diagnosis of impalpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography].
    Charpin C; Garcia S
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Oct; 179(7):1517-31; discussion 1532-7. PubMed ID: 8556425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist?
    Balleyguier C; Kinkel K; Fermanian J; Malan S; Djen G; Taourel P; Helenon O
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 15797297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Rapid neuronal filters in mammography].
    Eppler W; Stotzka R; Neiber HJ
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():40-1. PubMed ID: 9859247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.