These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9816642)

  • 21. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist?
    Balleyguier C; Kinkel K; Fermanian J; Malan S; Djen G; Taourel P; Helenon O
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 54(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 15797297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Rapid neuronal filters in mammography].
    Eppler W; Stotzka R; Neiber HJ
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():40-1. PubMed ID: 9859247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of algorithms to enhance spicules of spiculated masses on mammography.
    Sampat MP; Whitman GJ; Bovik AC; Markey MK
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Mar; 21(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 17431720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Bolivar AV; Gomez SS; Merino P; Alonso-Bartolomé P; Garcia EO; Cacho PM; Hoffmeister JW
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1086-92. PubMed ID: 20883182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
    Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image feature evaluation in two new mammography CAD prototypes.
    Hapfelmeier A; Horsch A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2011 Nov; 6(6):721-35. PubMed ID: 21380554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
    Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
    Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. WHAT CAN WE ACTUALLY SEE USING COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION IN MAMMOGRAPHY?
    Džoić Dominković M; Ivanac G; Radović N; Čavka M
    Acta Clin Croat; 2020 Dec; 59(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 34285427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
    Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Computer-assisted diagnosis in screening mammography].
    Bick U
    Radiologe; 1996 Jan; 36(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 8820375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mass detection in digitized mammograms using two independent computer-assisted diagnosis schemes.
    Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Dec; 167(6):1421-4. PubMed ID: 8956570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program.
    te Brake GM; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 9577496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer-aided screening mammography.
    Feig SA; Birdwell RL; Linver MN
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Jul; 357(1):84; author reply 85. PubMed ID: 17615628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
    Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Breast imaging and computer-aided detection.
    Hall FM
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1464-6. PubMed ID: 17409329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms.
    Taylor PM; Champness J; Given-Wilson RM; Potts HW; Johnston K
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jan; 77(913):21-7. PubMed ID: 14988134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) in mammography: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a new algorithm (Cyclopus, Medicad) with two commercial systems.
    Ciatto S; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Ienzi R; Martinelli F; Simone MV
    Radiol Med; 2009 Jun; 114(4):626-35. PubMed ID: 19444587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Computer-assisted analysis of mammograms in routine clinical diagnosis].
    Sittek H; Perlet C; Helmberger R; Linsmeier E; Kessler M; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 1998 Oct; 38(10):848-52. PubMed ID: 9830665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A comparison between physicians' interpretation and a CAD system's cancer detection by using a mammogram database in a physicians' self-learning course].
    Hatanaka Y; Matsubara T; Hara T; Shinohara N; Fukuoka D; Fujita H; Endo T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Mar; 58(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 12522345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.