These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9817035)

  • 1. Assessment of image post-processing and of measuring assistance tools in computed radiography. Evaluation of the weight-bearing knee.
    Sanfridsson J; Svahn G; Ryd L; Ahl TL; Sundén P; Jonsson K
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Nov; 39(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 9817035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed radiography for characterisation of the weight-bearing knee.
    Sanfridsson J; Svahn G; Jonsson K; Ryd L
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):514-9. PubMed ID: 9240669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orthopaedic measurements with computed radiography. Methodological development, accuracy, and radiation dose with special reference to the weight-bearing lower extremity and the dislocating patella.
    Sanfridsson J
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2001; (423):1-40. PubMed ID: 11338793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic measurement of femorotibial rotation in weight-bearing. The influence of flexion and extension in the knee on the extensor mechanism and angles of the lower extremity in a healthy population.
    Sanfridsson J; Ryd L; Svahn G; Fridén T; Jonsson K
    Acta Radiol; 2001 Mar; 42(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 11259950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Angular configuration of the knee. Comparison of conventional measurements and the QUESTOR Precision Radiography system.
    Sanfridsson J; Ryd L; Eklund K; Kouvaras Y; Jonsson K
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 8915266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional analysis of the skeleton of the lower extremities with 3D-precision radiography.
    Brunner R; Baumann JU
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1998; 117(6-7):351-6. PubMed ID: 9709849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of a PACS workstation with conventional film for interpretation of neonatal examinations: a paired comparison study.
    Franken EA; Smith WL; Berbaum KS; Kao SC; Sato Y
    Pediatr Radiol; 1991; 21(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 1891258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose and image information in computed radiography. A phantom study of angle measurements in the weight-bearing knee.
    Sanfridsson J; Holje G; Svahn G; Ryd L; Jonsson K
    Acta Radiol; 2000 Jul; 41(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 10937748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image preprocessing for a picture archiving and communication system.
    McNitt-Gray MF; Pietka E; Huang HK
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jul; 27(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 1644553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Considerations in measuring cartilage thickness using MRI: factors influencing reproducibility and accuracy.
    Koo S; Gold GE; Andriacchi TP
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Sep; 13(9):782-9. PubMed ID: 15961328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A relationship between dynamic and static assessments of knee joint load. Gait analysis and radiography before and after knee replacement in 45 patients.
    Hilding MB; Lanshammar H; Ryd L
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1995 Aug; 66(4):317-20. PubMed ID: 7676817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of mechanical axis alignment before and after total knee arthroplasty using long leg radiographs.
    Bowman A; Shunmugam M; Watts AR; Bramwell DC; Wilson C; Krishnan J
    Knee; 2016 Mar; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 26796777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The automatic assessment of knee radiographs in osteoarthritis using digital image analysis.
    Dacre JE; Huskisson EC
    Br J Rheumatol; 1989 Dec; 28(6):506-10. PubMed ID: 2590804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patellofemoral evaluation after total knee arthroplasty. Validation of a new weight-bearing axial radiographic view.
    Baldini A; Anderson JA; Cerulli-Mariani P; Kalyvas J; Pavlov H; Sculco TP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1810-7. PubMed ID: 17671022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomography scanogram compared to long leg radiograph for determining axial knee alignment.
    Holme TJ; Henckel J; Hartshorn K; Cobb JP; Hart AJ
    Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):440-3. PubMed ID: 25582134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New cephalometric images with a workstation. A preliminary report.
    Nakagawa K; Matsumoto N; Takatsuka S; Ueki K; Yamamoto E; Horii J; Matsui T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 9540093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
    Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhanced visualization processing: effect on workflow.
    Krupinski EA; Radvany M; Levy A; Ballenger D; Tucker J; Chacko A; VanMetter R
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Nov; 8(11):1127-33. PubMed ID: 11721812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of joint kinematics using a conventional clinical single-perspective flat-panel radiography system.
    Seslija P; Teeter MG; Yuan X; Naudie DD; Bourne RB; Macdonald SJ; Peters TM; Holdsworth DW
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):6090-103. PubMed ID: 23039648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
    Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.