160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9817220)
1. Deodorants: a clinical provocation study in fragrance-sensitive individuals.
Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Bruze M; Andersen KE; Frosch P; Dreier B; Lepoittevin JP; White I; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Oct; 39(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 9817220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deodorants: an experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal.
Svedman C; Bruze M; Johansen JD; Andersen KE; Goossens A; Frosch PJ; Lepoittevin JP; Rastogi S; White IR; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Apr; 48(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 12786728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deodorants on the European market: quantitative chemical analysis of 21 fragrances.
Rastogi SC; Johansen JD; Frosch P; Menné T; Bruze M; Lepoittevin JP; Dreier B; Andersen KE; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Jan; 38(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 9504243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deodorants are the leading cause of allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance ingredients.
Heisterberg MV; Menné T; Andersen KE; Avnstorp C; Kristensen B; Kristensen O; Kaaber K; Laurberg G; Henrik Nielsen N; Sommerlund M; Thormann J; Veien NK; Vissing S; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 May; 64(5):258-64. PubMed ID: 21480912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fragrance contact allergy: a clinical review.
Johansen JD
Am J Clin Dermatol; 2003; 4(11):789-98. PubMed ID: 14572300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens.
Katsarma G; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Oct; 41(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 10515097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Content and reactivity to product perfumes in fragrance mix positive and negative eczema patients. A study of perfumes used in toiletries and skin-care products.
Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jun; 36(6):291-6. PubMed ID: 9237007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of risk products for fragrance contact allergy: a case-referent study based on patients' histories.
Johansen JD; Andersen TF; Kjøller M; Veien N; Avnstorp C; Andersen KE; Menné T
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 9601907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Allergic contact dermatitis from the synthetic fragrances Lyral and acetyl cedrene in separate underarm deodorant preparations.
Handley J; Burrows D
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Nov; 31(5):288-90. PubMed ID: 7867324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fragrances and other materials in deodorants: search for potentially sensitizing molecules using combined GC-MS and structure activity relationship (SAR) analysis.
Rastogi SC; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Frosch PJ; Menné T; Bruze M; Dreier B; Andersen KE; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Dec; 39(6):293-303. PubMed ID: 9874020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
Trattner A; David M
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patch test results with patients' own perfumes, deodorants and shaving lotions: results of the IVDK 1998-2002.
Uter W; Geier J; Schnuch A; Frosch PJ
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 17309462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dermatotoxicologic clinical solutions: clinical management of fragrance mix #1 #2 patients?
Edwards A; Blickenstaff N; Coman G; Maibach H
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2015; 34(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 24964169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Allergic axillary dermatitis due to hydrogenated castor oil in a deodorant.
Taghipour K; Tatnall F; Orton D
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):168-9. PubMed ID: 18279156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of Lilial as a fragrance sensitizer in a perfume by bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and structure-activity relationships.
Arnau EG; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Rastogi SC; White IR; Lepoittevin JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Dec; 43(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 11140386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental elicitation with hydroxyisohexyl-3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde-containing deodorants.
Jørgensen PH; Jensen CD; Rastogi S; Andersen KE; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Mar; 56(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 17295689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First report of allergic contact dermatitis caused by sorbitan caprylate.
Vandeweghe J; Decoster E; Lapeere H
Contact Dermatitis; 2018 Feb; 78(2):162-164. PubMed ID: 29341184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2 ) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation.
Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruynzeel D; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Matura M; Orton D; Vigan M;
Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 22320667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Connubial allergic contact dermatitis caused by fragrance ingredients.
Jensen P; Garcia Ortiz P; Hartmann-Petersen S; Sandby-Møller J; Menné T; Thyssen JP
Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):e1-2. PubMed ID: 22653075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
