280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9817224)
1. Patch testing with nickel sulfate: comparison between 2 nickel sulfate preparations and 2 different test sites on the back.
Simonetti V; Manzini BM; Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Oct; 39(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 9817224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reactivity to euro coins and sensitization thresholds in nickel-sensitive subjects.
Seidenari S; Giusti F; Pellacani G; Antelmi AR; Foti C; Bonamonte D; Ayala F; Balato G; Cristaudo A; Stingeni L; Lisi P
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15987291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pretreatment of the test area with 1-day occlusion improves the response rate to NiSO4 5% pet. patch tests in subjects with a positive history of nickel allergy.
Seidenari S; Manzini BM; Belletti B
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Sep; 33(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 8565454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single doses of local betamethasone do not suppress allergic patch test reactions to nickel sulfate.
Molander G; Petman L; Kannas L; Lauerma AI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Apr; 50(4):218-21. PubMed ID: 15186376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre-treatment of nickel test areas with sodium lauryl sulfate detects nickel sensitivity in subjects reacting negatively to routinely performed patch tests.
Seidenari S; Motolese A; Belletti B
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Feb; 34(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 8681564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reactivity of the back revisited. Are there differences in reactivity in different parts of the back?
Björk AK; Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Nielsen C; Svedman C
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Jan; 76(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 27593358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positive nickel patch tests in infants are of low clinical relevance and rarely reproducible.
Mortz CG; Kjaer HF; Eller E; Osterballe M; Norberg LA; Høst A; Bindslev-Jensen C; Andersen KE
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2013 Feb; 24(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 23331531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch Testing in Children and Adolescents With Suspected Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
Meena S; Garg T; Chander R
Skinmed; 2016; 14(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 27784513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cobalt allergy: suitable test concentration, and concomitant reactivity to nickel and chromium.
Lidén C; Andersson N; Julander A; Matura M
Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Jun; 74(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 26996152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.
Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nickel allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
Fischer LA; Johansen JD; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 157(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 17634081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of patch testing with nickel sulfate in TRUE Test and in petrolatum at 2.5% and 5% concentrations.
Bach RO; Svendsen MT; Mose KF; Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2022 Mar; 86(3):233-234. PubMed ID: 34800302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nickel chloride/chlorides of divalent metal interactions in nickel-sensitive subjects.
Santucci B; Cannistraci C; Cristaudo A; Picardo M
Exp Dermatol; 1996 Oct; 5(5):254-9. PubMed ID: 8981023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre.
Clayton TH; Wilkinson SM; Rawcliffe C; Pollock B; Clark SM
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 154(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 16403103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Retrospective Study of Aimed Patch Testing With Aqueous Nickel Sulfate Hexahydrate at 30% and 15% in Patients With Dermatitis.
Bruze M; Hindsén M; Mowitz M
Dermatitis; 2018; 29(4):193-195. PubMed ID: 30024450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experience in patch testing: A 6-year retrospective review from a single academic allergy practice.
Sundquist BK; Yang B; Pasha MA
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2019 May; 122(5):502-507. PubMed ID: 30851460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epicutaneous patch test results in children and adults with allergic contact dermatitis in Karlovac county: a retrospective survey.
Kuljanac I; Knežević E; Cvitanović H
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2011; 19(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 21703155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-reactivity between nickel and palladium demonstrated by systemic administration of nickel.
Hindsén M; Spirén A; Bruze M
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jul; 53(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 15982224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
