384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9817398)
21. Impact of bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy on continence and cancer control.
Licht MR; Klein EA; Tuason L; Levin H
Urology; 1994 Dec; 44(6):883-7. PubMed ID: 7527169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Transitional cell carcinoma of the prostate in cystoprostatectomy specimens].
Liedberg F; Chebil G; Davidsson T; Malmström PU; Sherif A; Månsson W
Aktuelle Urol; 2003 Sep; 34(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 14566661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of bladder neck invasion and tumor extension to bladder neck margin by prostatic adenocarcinoma: a nomogram using biopsy data including transition zone tumor morphology.
Cohen RJ; Li J; Shannon T
Hum Pathol; 2016 Nov; 57():85-90. PubMed ID: 27473268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Findings of routine apical margin biopsy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Wambi CO; Patel T; Shapiro EY; Tal O; Hruby GW; Berg WT; Benson MC; Badani KK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Jun; 23(6):511-5. PubMed ID: 23621833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Selli C; De Antoni P; Moro U; Macchiarella A; Giannarini G; Crisci A
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2004; 38(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 15204424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy and postoperative urinary continence.
Razi A; Yahyazadeh SR; Sedighi Gilani MA; Kazemeyni SM
Urol J; 2009; 6(1):23-6; discussion 26. PubMed ID: 19241337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted.
Pierorazio PM; Epstein JI; Humphreys E; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW
J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 19914651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Peroperative biopsy of the sub-apical urethra during prostatectomy for cancer].
Ponthieu A; Delgrande J; Ivaldi A
Prog Urol; 1996 Apr; 6(2):250-5; discussion 255-6. PubMed ID: 8777418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Wieder JA; Soloway MS
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 9679867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database.
Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The bladder neck preservation in robot assisted radical prostatectomy: Surgical and pathological outcome.
Zazzara M; Gardiman MP; Dal Moro F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):12138. PubMed ID: 38193218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing--effects on continence and positive margins.
Deliveliotis C; Protogerou V; Alargof E; Varkarakis J
Urology; 2002 Nov; 60(5):855-8. PubMed ID: 12429315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins.
Braslis KG; Petsch M; Lim A; Civantos F; Soloway MS
Eur Urol; 1995; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 8536773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is "extreme" bladder neck preservation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy a safe procedure?
Dal Moro F; Zazzara M; Morlacco A; Gardiman MP; Costa G; Zattoni F
Urologia; 2020 Aug; 87(3):149-154. PubMed ID: 31964317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation.
Katz R; Salomon L; Hoznek A; de la Taille A; Antiphon P; Abbou CC
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2049-52. PubMed ID: 12771716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does urethral-sparing prostatectomy risk residual prostate cancer?
Tongco WP; Wehner MS; Basler JW
Urology; 2001 Mar; 57(3):495-8. PubMed ID: 11248627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A centralized comparison of radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy specimens: is there a difference according to the surgical approach?
Korman HJ; Leu PB; Huang RR; Goldstein NS
J Urol; 2002 Sep; 168(3):991-4. PubMed ID: 12187206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
