These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9819988)

  • 1. [The features of using intraosseous implants with intramobile elements].
    Matveeva AI; Ivanov AG; Gvetadze RSh; Gavriushin SS
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1998; 77(5):50-2. PubMed ID: 9819988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intramobile cylinder (IMZ) two-stage osteointegrated implant system with the intramobile element (IME): part I. Its ratinale and procedure for use.
    Babbush CA; Kirsch A; Mentag PJ; Hill B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1987; 2(4):203-16. PubMed ID: 3333644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction.
    Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of arch shape and implant position on stress distribution around implants supporting fixed full-arch prosthesis in edentulous maxilla.
    Sagat G; Yalcin S; Gultekin BA; Mijiritsky E
    Implant Dent; 2010 Dec; 19(6):498-508. PubMed ID: 21119354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.
    Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants.
    Williams KR; Watson CJ; Murphy WM; Scott J; Gregory M; Sinobad D
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Jul; 21(7):563-70. PubMed ID: 2094856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined effects of implant insertion depth and alveolar bone quality on periimplant bone strain induced by a wide-diameter, short implant and a narrow-diameter, long implant.
    Chou HY; Müftü S; Bozkaya D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 20970535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Three dimension finite element analysis of anisotropic mandible with dental implants effect on implant-bone interface].
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Liao SH; Zhang-Lin ; Chen H
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 44(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 19489259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Load transfer by fine threading the implant neck--a FEM study.
    Rahimi A; Bourauel C; Jager A; Gedrange T; Heinemann F
    J Physiol Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 60 Suppl 8():107-12. PubMed ID: 20400802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants.
    Brunski JB
    Dent Implantol Update; 1993 Oct; 4(10):77-81. PubMed ID: 7919404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shape optimization of dental implants.
    Shi L; Li H; Fok AS; Ucer C; Devlin H; Horner K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):911-20. PubMed ID: 18271372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical use of osseointegrated two-phase implant systems].
    Bochlogyros PN
    Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Jun; 4(2):53-60. PubMed ID: 2701229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Know when to use wide-bodied implants to limit bone stress.
    Jarvis WC
    Dent Implantol Update; 1996 Dec; 7(12):89-92. PubMed ID: 9525172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Osseointegrated implants with an intramobile element in the treatment of edentulous jaws.
    Shernoff AF; Edmonds PP; Ward RD; Matthews BL
    Compendium; 1991 Jun; 12(6):394, 396, 398 passim. PubMed ID: 1933989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modular transitional implants to support the interim maxillary overdenture.
    Bohsali K; Simon H; Kan JY; Redd M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Oct; 20(10):975-8, 980, 982-3; quiz 984. PubMed ID: 10650377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The two-phase implantation method using IMZ intramobile cylinder implants.
    Kirsch A
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(2):197-210. PubMed ID: 6368849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants.
    Lum LB
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 1811063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.