These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9822124)

  • 1. Radical prostatectomy specimens among Medicare patients in New York State: a review of pathologists' reports.
    Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Nenner RP
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):966-71. PubMed ID: 9822124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
    Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
    Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Maru N; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Wheeler TM
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Aug; 32(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 11521227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
    Kausik SJ; Blute ML; Sebo TJ; Leibovich BC; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Zincke H
    Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Iocca A; Scherer B; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 11125379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Importance of tumor location in patients with high preoperative prostate specific antigen levels (greater than 20 ng/ml) treated with radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Peck HJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17698095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.
    Aydin H; Tsuzuki T; Hernandez D; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 15351591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Importance of margin extent as a predictor of outcome after adjuvant radiotherapy for Gleason score 7 pT3N0 prostate cancer.
    Valicenti RK; Chervoneva I; Gomella LG
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1093-7. PubMed ID: 15001249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of early adjuvant hormonal therapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Zincke H; Lau W; Bergstralh E; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2208-15. PubMed ID: 11696737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of a map in radical prostatectomy specimen allows visual estimation of tumor volume.
    Bettendorf O; Oberpenning F; Köpke T; Heinecke A; Hertle L; Boecker W; Semjonow A
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 33(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17175129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome.
    Ward JF; Slezak JM; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H
    BJU Int; 2005 Apr; 95(6):751-6. PubMed ID: 15794776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
    Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
    Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.