223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9822124)
1. Radical prostatectomy specimens among Medicare patients in New York State: a review of pathologists' reports.
Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Nenner RP
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):966-71. PubMed ID: 9822124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer.
Vis AN; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Eur Urol; 2006 Aug; 50(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 16413660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Maru N; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Wheeler TM
Hum Pathol; 2001 Aug; 32(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 11521227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.
Kausik SJ; Blute ML; Sebo TJ; Leibovich BC; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak J; Zincke H
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 12216087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Iocca A; Scherer B; Zincke H
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 11125379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of tumor location in patients with high preoperative prostate specific antigen levels (greater than 20 ng/ml) treated with radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Peck HJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17698095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression.
Aydin H; Tsuzuki T; Hernandez D; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):551-5. PubMed ID: 15351591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Importance of margin extent as a predictor of outcome after adjuvant radiotherapy for Gleason score 7 pT3N0 prostate cancer.
Valicenti RK; Chervoneva I; Gomella LG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1093-7. PubMed ID: 15001249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
D'Amico AV; Wu Y; Chen MH; Nash M; Renshaw AA; Richie JP
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 11125380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of early adjuvant hormonal therapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Zincke H; Lau W; Bergstralh E; Blute ML
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2208-15. PubMed ID: 11696737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation of a map in radical prostatectomy specimen allows visual estimation of tumor volume.
Bettendorf O; Oberpenning F; Köpke T; Heinecke A; Hertle L; Boecker W; Semjonow A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 33(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17175129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome.
Ward JF; Slezak JM; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Zincke H
BJU Int; 2005 Apr; 95(6):751-6. PubMed ID: 15794776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
