These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9822469)

  • 1. Laparoscopic visual field. Voice vs foot pedal interfaces for control of the AESOP robot.
    Allaf ME; Jackman SV; Schulam PG; Cadeddu JA; Lee BR; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
    Surg Endosc; 1998 Dec; 12(12):1415-8. PubMed ID: 9822469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot.
    Jacobs LK; Shayani V; Sackier JM
    Surg Endosc; 1997 Jan; 11(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 8994989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voice-controlled robotic arm in laparoscopic surgery.
    Bacá I; Schultz C; Grzybowski L; Göetzen V
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):409-12. PubMed ID: 10411970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time visual servoing for laparoscopic surgery. Controlling robot motion with color image segmentation.
    Wei GQ; Arbter K; Hirzinger G
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1997; 16(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 9058581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Robot arm in laparoscopic surgery].
    Baca I
    Chirurg; 1997 Aug; 68(8):837-9. PubMed ID: 9377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system.
    Advincula AP
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17520648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study.
    Wagner AA; Varkarakis IM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Su LM
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16844449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of task performance of the camera-holder robots EndoAssist and Aesop.
    Nebot PB; Jain Y; Haylett K; Stone R; McCloy R
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2003 Oct; 13(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 14571171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of an intuitive writing interface and a laparoscopic robot for gynaecological laser assisted surgery.
    Tang HW; Van Brussel H; Sloten JV; Reynaerts D; Koninckx PR
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Jul; 219(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 16050220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Man-machine interfaces in computer assisted surgery.
    Visarius H; Gong J; Scheer C; Haralamb S; Nolte LP
    Comput Aided Surg; 1997; 2(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 9292262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy with the aid of the AESOP 2000 robot.
    Hubens G; Ysebaert D; Vaneerdeweg W; Chapelle T; Eyskens E
    Acta Chir Belg; 1999; 99(3):125-7; discussion 127-9. PubMed ID: 10427347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery.
    Mettler L; Ibrahim M; Jonat W
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Oct; 13(1O):2748-50. PubMed ID: 9804224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.
    Rassweiler J; Frede T
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):610-28. PubMed ID: 12224160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic vascular anastomoses: does robotic (Zeus-Aesop) assistance help to overcome the learning curve?
    Nio D; Bemelman WA; Balm R; Legemate DA
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Aug; 19(8):1071-6. PubMed ID: 16021377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient?
    Kraft BM; Jäger C; Kraft K; Leibl BJ; Bittner R
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Aug; 18(8):1216-23. PubMed ID: 15457381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotics and telesurgery--an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Rassweiler J; Safi KC; Subotic S; Teber D; Frede T
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2005; 14(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 16754625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design and preliminary in vivo validation of a robotic laparoscope holder for minimally invasive surgery.
    Herman B; Dehez B; Duy KT; Raucent B; Dombre E; Krut S
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 19455594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Use of robotics in laparoscopic urological surgery: state of the art].
    Long JA; Descotes JL; Skowron O; Troccaz J; Cinquin P; Boillot B; Terrier N; Rambeaud JJ
    Prog Urol; 2006 Feb; 16(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 16526532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
    Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.