These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9823075)

  • 1. Evaluation of interfacial bond strengths between amalgam and composite inlay.
    Abdel-Aziz AH; Alhadainy HA
    Am J Dent; 1998 Jun; 11(3):131-3. PubMed ID: 9823075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interfacial bond strengths of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam.
    Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Coury TL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 9693653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tensile bond strength of two ceramic and three resin composite inlay materials placed using a resin luting agent.
    Thordrup M; Isidor F; Ravnholt G
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 10348591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shear bond strength of composite resin and amalgam adhesive systems to dentin.
    Evans DB; Neme AM
    Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10477994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface treatment effects on amalgam repair strength.
    Diefenderfer KE; Reinhardt JW; Brown SB
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 9545913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tensile adhesion evaluation in a new universal test.
    Staninec M; Torii Y; Watanabe LG; Kawakami M; Tonn EM
    Am J Dent; 1992 Aug; 5(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 1290606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentinal bond strengths and microleakage of a 4-META adhesive to amalgam and composite resin.
    Cooley RL; Tseng EY; Barkmeier WW
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Dec; 22(12):979-83. PubMed ID: 1813915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro bond strength of repaired amalgam with adhesive bonding systems.
    Roeder LB; DeSchepper EJ; Powers JM
    J Esthet Dent; 1991; 3(4):126-32. PubMed ID: 1817580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Durability of the resin bond strength to the alumina ceramic Procera.
    Hummel M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):498-508. PubMed ID: 15081557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond strength of composites to hybrid ionomers.
    Tate WH; Friedl KH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 8957904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amalgam shear bond strength to dentin using single-bottle primer/adhesive systems.
    Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):222-6. PubMed ID: 10649912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents.
    Yoshida K; Kamada K; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 11208209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.