These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9823115)

  • 21. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yun HH; Kim SK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shaping ability of NT Engine and McXim rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 1997 Jul; 30(4):270-8. PubMed ID: 9477813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
    Schäfer E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the shaping ability of RaCe and FlexMaster rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals.
    Merrett SJ; Bryant ST; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):960-2. PubMed ID: 16982273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Lohmann D
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Lohmann D
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 12190907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro comparison of canal preparation using two automated rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation techniques.
    Jardine SJ; Gulabivala K
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 11307215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digitization, analysis and processing of dental images during root canal preparation with Quantec Series 2000 instruments.
    Fabra-Campos H; Rodríguez-Vallejo J
    Int Endod J; 2001 Jan; 34(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11307378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
    Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
    Ayar LR; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
    J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.